Telangana High Court
WP/3464/2000 of Andhra Pradesh Transmission Corporation Limited, Vs The Managing Director, on 31 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO:3464 of 2000 Between: A.P.Transmission Corporation Limited ..... PETITIONER AND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:3464of2000
Between:
A.P.Transmission Corporation Limited
AND
..... PETITIONER
The Managing Director, AP Transco Ltd., Hyderabadand others
.....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR. DHONDAY RAM MANE
Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2:MR. S.RAVINDRANATH
The Court made the following :
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
Page 1 of 2
“For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, thepetitioner union respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court may bepleased to issue an order, proceedings of a writ in the nature ofMandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directingrespondents 1 and 2 to initiate necessary steps to regularize theservices of the members of the petitioners union (whose namesand other particulars are described in the annexure appended tothis affidavit) in the regular posts of revenue cashier or recordassistant to whichever posts they are eligible as per their educationqualifications and length of experience and service in terms ofB.P.Ms.No.36, dated 18.5.1997 and the law laid down by theSupreme Court in the case of the Secretary, Haryana StateElectricity Board v. Suresh, 1999 LL.J.Vol.I page 1086 in fulfillmentof the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 16 and 21read with Article 39 of the Constitution of India.”
At the hearing, Sri Dhonday Ram Mane, learned counsel for thepetitioner sought for permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petitionwith liberty to approach the Industrial Tribunal for the relief claimed inthis writ petition.
The request of the learned counsel is accepted and the writpetition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayermade.
As a sequel to dismissal of main petition as withdrawn,WPMP.Nos.4553 and 4554 of 2000 filed by the petitioner for interimrelief are disposed of as infructuous.
31[st] DECEMBER, 2008.kvni
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…