Telangana High Court
CRLP/2227/2009 of Uppala Raghupathi Rao Vs The State of A.P on 30 December 2010
COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY THE THIRTYETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 2227 OF 2009. Between: Uppala Raghupathi Rao & Anr. … Petitioners V/s. The State of Andhra Pradesh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY THE THIRTYETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2227OF 2009.
Between:
Uppala Raghupathi Rao & Anr. … Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Andhra PradeshRepresented by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra PradeshHyderabad & Anr. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri K. Buchi Babu Counsel for the Respondents : Addl.Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order : (order follows 2[nd] page)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2227OF 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
This Criminal Petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C.seeking to quash the proceedings in DVC.No.36 of 2008 on the file ofthe Court of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Karimnagaragainst the petitioner and to pass such other suitable orders as thisCourt may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
2. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counselfor the petitioner called absent and there is no representation on hisbehalf.
3. Perused the records and heard the learned AdditionalPublic Prosecutor representing the State.
4. In any event, taking into consideration the contentionsraised in the criminal petition and also the case arising out ofDomestic Violence Act 2005, this Court is of the opinion that thepresence of the petitioner before the trial court is dispensed withexcept on the specific date on which the learned Magistrate directsthe petitioner to be present before the trial court.
5. With the above observation, the Criminal Petition isdismissed.
______________________
JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 2227 OF 2009
Circulation No. 38Date:30-12-2010Court Master: IsLComputer No.43