Telangana High Court
WP/39443/2014 of Mohd. Waliullah Sameer Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.39443 of 2014 ORDER: The petitioners herein alleged that they have purchased an extent of Ac.12-39 gts., and Ac.6-17 gts., in Sy.Nos.300 and 305 respectively at Damargidda village, Chevella mandal, Ranga Reddy District. They further alleged
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKARWRIT PETITION No.39443 of 2014
ORDER:
The petitioners herein alleged that they have purchased anextent of Ac.12-39 gts., and Ac.6-17 gts., in Sy.Nos.300 and 305respectively at Damargidda village, Chevella mandal, RangaReddy District. They further alleged that there is a civil suit filedfor perpetual injunction pending before the Junior Civil Judge,Chevella. However, the number of the said suit is not mentioned inthe affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. It is alleged thatthough there is a civil dispute pending with respondent Nos.4 and5, the petitioners herein alleging that the third respondent isinterfering with the civil dispute, the present writ petition is filed.
On instructions, Government Pleader for Home says that nocomplaint is received from the petitioners by the third respondentand it is specifically stated that the dispute between the petitionersand respondent Nos.4 and 5 is purely of civil nature and the thirdrespondent has nothing to do with the said dispute and they havenever interfered with the civil dispute much less between thepetitioners and respondent Nos.4 and 5.
As far as the present writ petition is concerned, anticipatingthe action by the third respondent the petitioners herein appear tohave filed this writ petition. However, as on today since the thirdrespondent has not interfered with the civil disputes between thepetitioners and respondent Nos.4 and 5, the same is recorded andno further orders are required.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall beno order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, in this writ petitionshall stand closed.
December 30, 2014PN
____________________________VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
Pn
WRIT PETITION No.39443 of 2014
December 30, 2014