Telangana High Court
WP/25962/2006 of T. Sivamma W/o late Sidhappa Vs The Municipal Commissioner, Sadhasivapet Municipaltiy, on 22 December 2006
SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.25962 OF 2006 Date: 22-12-2006 Between: T. Sivamma, w/o late Sidhappa, Hindu, aged 65 years, R/o 4-5-63/2, Ramamandir Street, Sadhasivapet, Medak District. … Petitioner. And The Municipal Commissioner, Sadhasivapet Municipality,
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NO.25962 OF 2006
Date: 22-12-2006
Between:T. Sivamma, w/o late Sidhappa,Hindu, aged 65 years,R/o 4-5-63/2, Ramamandir Street,Sadhasivapet, Medak District.
… Petitioner.
And
The Municipal Commissioner,Sadhasivapet Municipality,Sadhasivapet, Medak District.
… Respondent.
* * *
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Sri Akella Padma, learned counsel representing thepetitioner and Sri Polisetty Radhakrishna, learned StandingCounsel representing the respondent.
2. On 15.12.2006 Sri Polisetty Radhakrishna had taken noticeand requested time to get instructions and the matter was directedto appear in the list on 20.12.2006. Again at request the matter iscoming up today for admission.
3. It is brought to the notice of this Court that this Courtdisposed of similar writ petition in W.P.No.24854 of 2006 on 04[th]
December 2006 and a request is made that the present writpetition also be disposed of on the same lines.
4. The writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus declaringaction of the respondent in not passing any order on thepetitioner’s application dated 12.7.2005 for granting permission forconstruction of a house though betterment charges were collectedfrom the petitioner for building No.2-7-13 (old) and 2-7-14 (new) vide H.No.4-5-63/2,Sadhasivapeta, Medak District, even after a lapse of more thanyear, as illegal and arbitrary and pass such other suitable orders.
5. Several factual details are narrated in paragraphs 2 to 4 ofthe affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. In the light of thefacts and circumstances, this Court is of the considered opinionthat the writ petition be disposed of directing the respondent toconsider the application of the petitioner dated 12.7.2005 for grantof permission for construction of house in relation to the subjectmatter of the writ petition in accordance with law within a period offour weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Noorder as to costs.
Date: 22[nd] December 2006.
__________________
P.S.NARAYANA, J.
BSB