Telangana High Court
WP/45854/2022 of Shaik Nazeer Uddin alias Nazeer Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others on 30 December 2022
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY [ 3183 ] @ Nazeer, S/o. Late. Shaik Mohiuddin, Occupation. 2-76, Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 45854 OF 2022
Between:
Shaik Nazeer Uddin@ [Nazeer, ][S/o. ][Late. Shaik ][Mohiuddin, ][Occupation.]Business, R/o. H.No.2-76, Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga ReddyDist, Hyderabad, TSDist, Hyderabad, TS
...PETITIONER
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department,Secretariate, Hyderabad.Secretariate, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Gachibowli Police Commissionerate,Cyberabad.Cyberabad.
3. The Station House Officer, Narsingi Police Station, Ranga Reddy District.
4. B.Suguna, W/o.Late B-Jangaiah, Occ.- Household, R/o. H.No.2-94, NarsingiVillage, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy district, Hyderabad.Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy district, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Ariicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ inthe nature of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the 2nd and 3rd respondent inthe nature of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the 2nd and 3rd respondent inregistering the FIR on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, dated 1811212022against the 4th respondent and associates illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutionaland consequently direct the 2rid and 3rd respondents to register the FIR againstthe 4th respondent and others pursuant to tfie complaint dated 18h212022 lodgedby the petitioner,andtep+eeseC;the 4th respondent and others pursuant to tfie complaint dated 18h212022 lodgedby the petitioner,andtep+eeseC; lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tothe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased toissue interim direction to the 2nd and 3rd respondent to register the FIR against Ythe 4th respondent and the 4th respondent and others pursuant to the complainl daled 1811212022 lodgedby the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petitionrand-berpleraseF
Counsel {or the Petitioner: SRl. MADHAVI PRIYA MANTENA
Counsel for the Respondent Rl TO R3: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
t,}
HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDYWRIT PETITION No.45854 OF 2022
ORDER: (ORAL)
This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not acting upon the complaint of the petitioner dated18.12.2022 against respondent No.4 and her associates.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedAssistant Government Pleader for Home, and perused the materialavailable on record.
3. ln the written instructions dated 26.12.2022 issued by the Sub-lnspector of Police, Narsingi Police Station, Cyberabad, it is stated thatthe pursuant to complaint of the petitioner, GD entry was made andenquiry was conducted. The petition/complaint of the petitioner wasclosed as'civil in nature'and the same was intimated to the petitionerthrough notice dated 23122022. A copy of the written instructionsalong with said notice is served on the learned counsel for thepetitioner.
4. ln view of the above, the writ petition is closed as no orders arerequired to be passed. The petitioner is given liberty to availappropriate remedy if aggrieved by the closure repo(.
I
To,
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pendingin the writ petition stand closed. No order as to costs.
SD/-T..IAYASREEASSISTANT REGISTRAR,/
\t'SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
1. One CC to SRl. MADHAVI PRTYA MANTENAAdvocate [OpUC][OpUC]
2 Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana,Hyderabad [OUT]Hyderabad [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies
GHIGH COURTBVRJDATED: 3011212022?-(To\a$rll,:)o[t [lutl]J. [ta..]i.') .ORDEFI'(:.: * r',;'; .i:WP.No.45854 ot 2022
WRIT PETITION IS CLOSED OF WITHOUT COST