Telangana High Court

WP/45854/2022 of Shaik Nazeer Uddin alias Nazeer Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY [ 3183 ] @ Nazeer, S/o. Late. Shaik Mohiuddin, Occupation. 2-76, Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO: 45854 OF 2022

Between:

Shaik Nazeer Uddin@ [Nazeer, ][S/o. ][Late. Shaik ][Mohiuddin, ][Occupation.]Business, R/o. H.No.2-76, Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga ReddyDist, Hyderabad, TSDist, Hyderabad, TS

...PETITIONER

AND

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department,Secretariate, Hyderabad.Secretariate, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Gachibowli Police Commissionerate,Cyberabad.Cyberabad.

3. The Station House Officer, Narsingi Police Station, Ranga Reddy District.

4. B.Suguna, W/o.Late B-Jangaiah, Occ.- Household, R/o. H.No.2-94, NarsingiVillage, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy district, Hyderabad.Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy district, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Ariicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ inthe nature of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the 2nd and 3rd respondent inthe nature of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the 2nd and 3rd respondent inregistering the FIR on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, dated 1811212022against the 4th respondent and associates illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutionaland consequently direct the 2rid and 3rd respondents to register the FIR againstthe 4th respondent and others pursuant to tfie complaint dated 18h212022 lodgedby the petitioner,andtep+eeseC;the 4th respondent and others pursuant to tfie complaint dated 18h212022 lodgedby the petitioner,andtep+eeseC; lA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tothe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased toissue interim direction to the 2nd and 3rd respondent to register the FIR against Ythe 4th respondent and the 4th respondent and others pursuant to the complainl daled 1811212022 lodgedby the petitioner pending disposal of the writ petitionrand-berpleraseF

Counsel {or the Petitioner: SRl. MADHAVI PRIYA MANTENA

Counsel for the Respondent Rl TO R3: GP FOR HOME

The Court made the following: ORDER

t,}

HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDYWRIT PETITION No.45854 OF 2022

ORDER: (ORAL)

This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not acting upon the complaint of the petitioner dated18.12.2022 against respondent No.4 and her associates.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedAssistant Government Pleader for Home, and perused the materialavailable on record.

3. ln the written instructions dated 26.12.2022 issued by the Sub-lnspector of Police, Narsingi Police Station, Cyberabad, it is stated thatthe pursuant to complaint of the petitioner, GD entry was made andenquiry was conducted. The petition/complaint of the petitioner wasclosed as'civil in nature'and the same was intimated to the petitionerthrough notice dated 23122022. A copy of the written instructionsalong with said notice is served on the learned counsel for thepetitioner.

4. ln view of the above, the writ petition is closed as no orders arerequired to be passed. The petitioner is given liberty to availappropriate remedy if aggrieved by the closure repo(.

I

To,

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pendingin the writ petition stand closed. No order as to costs.

SD/-T..IAYASREEASSISTANT REGISTRAR,/

\t'SECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

1. One CC to SRl. MADHAVI PRTYA MANTENAAdvocate [OpUC][OpUC]

2 Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana,Hyderabad [OUT]Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies

GHIGH COURTBVRJDATED: 3011212022?-(To\a$rll,:)o[t [lutl]J. [ta..]i.') .ORDEFI'(:.: * r',;'; .i:WP.No.45854 ot 2022

WRIT PETITION IS CLOSED OF WITHOUT COST

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead