Telangana High Court
MACMA/1426/2010 of M/S.ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Vs M.KISTAIAH AND 2 ORS on 31 December 2020
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEI\/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD MOTOR AcCIDE NT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1426 OF 2010 Appeal filed Under Section 173 of M.V. Act against the Judgment and
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEI\/BERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
MOTOR AcCIDE NT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1426 OF 2010
Appeal filed Under Section 173 of M.V. Act against the Judgment and Decreemade in O.P.No.453 of 2005 dated 19.11.200B on the file of the Court of the SpecialJudge for the Trial of Offences under SCs and STs (POA) - Cum - Vl Additionall\rletropolitan Sessions Judge - Cum - Additional Chairman, lt/otor Accidents ClaimsTribunal - cum - XX Additional Chief Judge, Secunderabad.
Between:
lV/s lClCl Lombard General lnsurance Company Limited, represented by itsIVlanaging Director O/o. lClCl Towers, Bandra - Kurla Complex, l\,4umbai - 400051. (Policy No. 2708,1 valid from 7-12-2003 to 06-12-2004)IVlanaging Director O/o. lClCl Towers, Bandra - Kurla Complex, l\,4umbai - 400051. (Policy No. 2708,1 valid from 7-12-2003 to 06-12-2004)
...AppellanUR-2
AND
1. N/. Kistaiah, S/o. l\/. tr/allaiah, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Ponnal Village, RangaReddy District. Now R/o.Near Ram Theatre, Lalapet, Secunderabad.Reddy District. Now R/o.Near Ram Theatre, Lalapet, Secunderabad.
2. Ir/. Rukumbai, W/o. l\,4. Kistaiah, Occ.Household, R/o. Ponnal Village, RangaReddy District, Now R/o. Near Ram Theatre, Lalapet, Secunderabad.Reddy District, Now R/o. Near Ram Theatre, Lalapet, Secunderabad.
3. lr//s Nitya Transport, represented by C. IVahesh Kumar, O/o. Survey No.197,Bachpally, Quthbullapur, Ranga Reddy District.Bachpally, Quthbullapur, Ranga Reddy District.
...Respondentsi Petitioners 1, 2 and R-1
Counsel for the Appellant: SRI RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA
Page 1 of 4
Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
:i
IiO
N'BLESRIJUSTIC ET.AMARNATH GOUD
THE
MACMA No.1426 OF. 2O1O
JUDGMENT:
Durir-rg the pendency oI the appea.l, the matter r,r,as ret-erredto the Lok Adalat, and thc samc rvas settlcd bcforc thc Lok Adalat,vide Award dateci 07. 11 .2O2O.to the Lok Adalat, and thc samc rvas settlcd bcforc thc Lok Adalat,vide Award dateci 07. 11 .2O2O.
Accordingly, the MACMA is disposcd of, in rerms tl1. theaward passed by the Lok Adalat. No order as toCOSLSaward passed by the Lok Adalat. No order as toCOSLS
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, il any, pending1nthis appeal shall stand closcd.
SD/. N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAOASSISTANT REGISTRARGPSECTION OFFICERASSISTANT REGISTRARGPSECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,1. The Speciar Judge for the Triar of offences under SCs and STs (poA) - cum -vl Addition_ar Metroporitan Sessions Judge - cum - Additionrr cirirr'un, rr,loto,.' Accidents craims Tribunar - cum - XX Aoditionar chief Judge, s".rnJ"ruurJ.(With Records)2. Onb CC to Sri Ravi Shankar Jandhyala, Advocate tOpUCl3. Two CD Copies (Along with a copy of Lok Adalat Award)
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 11212020
JUDGMENT
Page 2 of 4
MACMA.No.1426 of 2010
DISPOSING OF THE M,A.C.M.AIN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT AWARD.
{ile\;14?€JL)oI2 -fAil 2C2lo.L** oa,pPT, BEFORE THE tOK ADALAT
HELD AT HYDERABAD
[Orgonized by [High ]Court Legol Services CommifleeHigh Courl fqr lhe Slole of Telonoono( lt,l r: L,!l t v i t" i' 1,.1,,t,, ie ;;;' ;Xl';,under Secrion r ? of theTegor seiviiLs hutirorities Aci, r 9B7 (centror Act)lMACMA No. ['t426 ]of 20]O
(Before the Hon'ble High Courl)
(Agoinst the order in op.No. 453 of 2005 on the fire of the choirmon, Moror Accidenrs croimsTribunol-spl.Judge for lriol of otfences under scs & sTs (poA) Acl-cum-vt Addt .MelropotilonTribunol-spl.Judge for lriol of otfences under scs & sTs (poA) Acl-cum-vt Addt .MelropotilonSession Judge -cum-XX Addt. Chiet Judge Secunderobod. )
[No. [of proceedings ][of ][the ][High ]Court Legr:l Services CommilleeORDER ROC.No. 1 035/HCLSC/2020, Doied O4-t 1-2O2Ol
Conclusion
The obove Cose between the porties hoving been referred fordelerminotion to the LOK ADALAT ond the porlies hoving compromised thecose / molter, the following Aword is possed in terms of the settlemenl:delerminotion to the LOK ADALAT ond the porlies hoving compromised thecose / molter, the following Aword is possed in terms of the settlemenl:
Page 3 of 4
This MACMA orises out of ihe order doted l9-ll-2008 inOP.No.453 of 2005 on the file of ihe Choirmon, Motor VehicleAccident Cloims Tribunol-Spl. Judge for iriol of offences under SCs &STs (POA) Act-Cum-Vl Addl. Metropoliton Session Judge- Addl.-currr-XX Addl.Chief Judge Secunderobod t 2- The Tribunol hos gronled compensotion ofRs. 3,97,A001- (RupeesThree lokh Ninely-Seven lhousond only) wiproporiioncrte costsond inlerest @) 6% per onnum from the doief peiiticn till the doteof deposii. Aggrieved by ihe order, the lnsronce Compony hospreferred this oppeol. In view of lhe lotelt Judgments of theHon'ble Supreme Court of lrrdio, New Delhi, ond in consullotion withthe viclim, the Appellont/jrrsuronce Compony intends to withdrowthe oppeol.Three lokh Ninely-Seven lhousond only) wiproporiioncrte costsond inlerest @) 6% per onnum from the doief peiiticn till the doteof deposii. Aggrieved by ihe order, the lnsronce Compony hospreferred this oppeol. In view of lhe lotelt Judgments of theHon'ble Supreme Court of lrrdio, New Delhi, ond in consullotion withthe viclim, the Appellont/jrrsuronce Compony intends to withdrowthe oppeol.
3. The Appellonl / 2nd Respondent - rcrcr Lombord Generor rnsurqnceCompony Limited, Sri Md. Bobu, Stote tJeod-Legol hos representedthrough online over the link provided by ihe High Courl LegolServices Committee, High Courl for the Stotef Telongono, ond heseeks permission to wilhdrow the oppeAccordingly, theAppellont is permilted to wllhdrqwCompony Limited, Sri Md. Bobu, Stote tJeod-Legol hos representedthrough online over the link provided by ihe High Courl LegolServices Committee, High Courl for the Stotef Telongono, ond heseeks permission to wilhdrow the oppeAccordingly, theAppellont is permilted to wllhdrqw4. ln view of lhe obove representolion modon beholf of theAppello n t/lnsuro nce Compony, the oppeol stonds disposed oswithdrown.Appello n t/lnsuro nce Compony, the oppeol stonds disposed oswithdrown.
5. The lnsuronce Compony is reody to deposit the remoiningdecreetol omounl with occrued interesl ofter giving due credit lothe omount olreody deposited, within (30) doys from the dote ofreceipt of copy of ihis oword.decreetol omounl with occrued interesl ofter giving due credit lothe omount olreody deposited, within (30) doys from the dote ofreceipt of copy of ihis oword.
6. The porties ore informed thot lhe couri fee, if ony, poid by ony ofthem sholl be refunded.them sholl be refunded.
7. No order os to the cosis of ihe oppeol ,!i\L [li]uilIroN a^a"l[a-.]ChoirmonMemberMember.:':.. ., [.]/. [,.-.]Dote: 07.1 [,l.2020]lt ': 'r,-.ti(-.(L 0ii Atr.iiA ith.?....-clsimittesI
I
Page 4 of 4
Loading citations and judicial treatment…