Telangana High Court
WP/24168/2020 of P. Venkateshwara Rao Vs The State of Telangana on 30 December 2020
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PET|T|ON NO: 24168 OF 2020 uetween: 1. P. Venkateshwara Rao, S/o. P. Rajashwar Rao, Aoe. 58 Vears,
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original J urisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEIVBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PET|T|ON NO: 24168 OF 2020
uetween:
1. P. Venkateshwara Rao, S/o. P. Rajashwar Rao, Aoe. 58 Vears, Occ.9overnment [Employee, ][R/o. ][H.No.3-54/1 ][,Sai ][Bharathi ][Redidency, Ftat ][No ][101,]lVallikharjuna Nagar, Uppal Depot, Hyderabad- 500039.9overnment [Employee, ][R/o. ][H.No.3-54/1 ][,Sai ][Bharathi ][Redidency, Ftat ][No ][101,]lVallikharjuna Nagar, Uppal Depot, Hyderabad- 500039.2. Ch. Anjaiah, S/o. Late.Narsuji, Age.58 years, Occ. Government Employee, R/o,H.No. 7-3-7311, Sajanan Lal Street, Near Old Gandhi Hospital, Secundeiabad.H.No. 7-3-7311, Sajanan Lal Street, Near Old Gandhi Hospital, Secundeiabad.3. K. Shaym Sunder Rao, S/o. Late. Chandramoulishwer, Age. 58 years, Occ.G.overnment Employee, R/o.H.No.12-2-417141 , Sharada Nagar C6lony, Gudil\,4alkapur, Hyderabad- 500006G.overnment Employee, R/o.H.No.12-2-417141 , Sharada Nagar C6lony, Gudil\,4alkapur, Hyderabad- 5000064. K Gangadhar, S/o. Gangaram, Age. 58 years, Occ. Government Employee, R/o.H.No. 1-51-29iGAl3, Pangara Colony, Nizamabad-503230H.No. 1-51-29iGAl3, Pangara Colony, Nizamabad-503230
...PETIT|ONERS
AND
'1 . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, (Endowments)Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, (Endowments)Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofI\,4andamus declaring the action of Respondents not giving at least one promotion tothe Petitioners in their 28 years of service as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable,Violative Article 309 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct theRespondent No.2 to promote the Petitioners as executive officers GRADE-lll beforetheir superannuation.lA NO: 1 OF 2020their superannuation.lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to drrectthe Respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 10.12.2020 before thePetitioners superannuation.Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. A. RAVINDER REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court at the stage of admission made the following: ORDER
i
t
THE HON'BI.E SRI [JUSTICE ][ABHINAND ][KUMAR ][SHAVILI]
WRIT PETITION No.24168 of[2020]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ [petition ][is ][being ][disposed ][of ][ot ][the ][odmission stoge]wiih the consent of [both ]Porties.
This writ [petition ][is ][filed ][seeking ][the ][following ][relief:]
"...... to issue a writ, order or [direction more ][particutarty]one in the nature of Writ [of ][Mandamus ][dectaring ][the action]of respondents in not [giving ][at ][least one promotion ][to ][the]petitioners in their 28 [years ]of [service ][as ][ittegal, ][arbitrary,]unreasonabte, viotative [of ][Articte ][309 ][of the ][Constitution]of India and consequentty [direct ][the ][Respondent ][No.2 ][to]promote the Petitioners as executive [officers ][GRADE'lll]before their superannuation......".one in the nature of Writ [of ][Mandamus ][dectaring ][the action]of respondents in not [giving ][at ][least one promotion ][to ][the]petitioners in their 28 [years ]of [service ][as ][ittegal, ][arbitrary,]unreasonabte, viotative [of ][Articte ][309 ][of the ][Constitution]of India and consequentty [direct ][the ][Respondent ][No.2 ][to]promote the Petitioners as executive [officers ][GRADE'lll]before their superannuation......".
Heord leorned counsel oppeoring [for ][the ][petitioners ][ond ][the]leorned Government [Pleoder ][oppeoring ][for ][the respondenis.]
It hos been contended by [the ][peiitioners ][thot ][they ][ore]working os Junior Assistonts [in ][the ][Temple ][ond ][they ore ][fully eligible]ond [quolified ]io be [promoted ][to ][the ][post ][of ][Executive Officer]Grode-lll.
Leorned counsel oppeoring for [the ][pelitioners ][hod]contended thot thot the [petitioners ][hove ][rendered ][more ][thon]twenly [yeors ]of service, bui [the ][respondents ][ore ][not ][considering]thelr coses for [promotion ]lo [the ][post ][of ][Executive ][Officer Grode-lll']The [petltioners ]ore [going ]to [retire. ][The ][pelitioners ][hove ][submitted]representotions to ihe [respondenls ][on ][23.11.2020 ][ond ][10.12.2020]requesting 1o consider lheir [coses ][for ][promolion ][lo ][the ][post ][of]Executive Officer Grode-lll in terms of [G.O.Ms.No.262 ][doted]20.05.2002.
!
Leorned Governmenl [Pleoder ][oppeoring ][for ][the ][respondents]hod contended thot [since ][lhe ][petitioners' ][representolions ][ore]the [respondenls ][would ][consider the]pending with the respondenis, some ond [poss ]oppropriole [orders ][in ][occordonce ][with ][low']
This Court, hoving considered [the ][rivol ][submissions ][mode ][by]the porties, is of the [considered view ][lhot ][lhis ][wril ][petition ][con ][be]disposed of direcling [the ][respondents ][to ][consider ][the]representolions [submilted ][by ][the ][petilioners ][on ][23 ][1 ][1 ][2020 ond]10.12.2020 ond [poss ][oppropriote ][orders ][in occordonce ][wilh ][low']wilhin o reosonoble [period, ][preferobly ][wilhin ][o ][period ][of ][eight]weeks from lhe dote [of ][receipt ol o ][copy ][of ][this ][order']
With the obove observotions, [this ][writ ][petition ][is ][disposed ][of ][']No costs.
Pending miscelloneous [petitions, if ][ony, ][sholl ][slond closed']
SD/- K.AMMAJIREGIRAR
ASSISTANT REGI
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The Principal Secretary, [(Endowments) Revenue Department, ][State ][of]
Telanoana. Secretariat. Hvderabad
2. The Ctmmissioner, Endowments Department, [Hyderabad. ][Telangana ][State]
3. One CC to Sri A. Ravinder Reddy, [Advocate ]IOPUC]4. Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court [for ][the State ][of ][Telangana ][at]\Hyderabad. [OUT]5. Two CD CopiescHR rr\----"\ - I
HIGH COURT
DATED:3011212020
'{1HEsIA(0 [5 ]JAN [2021]Z.a**ORDERW.P.No.24168 of 2020
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONAT THE STAGE OF ADMISSIONWITHOUT COSTStsrJj;'u\.'F,-rioieA