Telangana High Court
WP/29866/2010 of Ngabalimi Vs The District Collector, on 31 December 2010
MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.29866 of 2010 DT.31.12.2010 Between: Nagabalimi and another … Petitioners And The District Collector, Mahaboob Nagar, Mahaboob Nagar District and others … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Writ Petition No.29866 of 2010
DT.31.12.2010
Between:
Nagabalimi and another
And
… Petitioners
The District Collector, Mahaboob Nagar, Mahaboob Nagar District andothers … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners:Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5: AGP for Panchayat RajCounsel for respondent No.6 : Sri P.Raghavender Reddy The Court made the following ORDER:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The grievance of the petitioners in this writ petition is that the bills to thetune of Rs.7,25,000/-, representing the value of the works executed by them, inrespect of item Nos.34 and 35, pertaining to Duvvasipalle and SasanoolVillages of Itkyal Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District, are not being paid and thatrepresentation, dated 29.03.2010, made to respondent No.1 I this regard is notbeing disposed of.
Though the case was adjourned to enable the respondents to filecounter affidavits, neither the counter affidavits are filed nor instructions arereported.
Inasmuch as the petitioners’ grievance needs to be addressed andpayments to be made to them, if it is found that they have executed the works in question, respondent No.1 is directed to dispose of the petitioners’representation, if received by him, and take appropriate decision thereon. If it isfound that the petitioners are entitled to payment of the amounts towards thevalue of the contracts stated to have been executed by them, respondent No.1shall issue appropriate directions for such payment. This exercise shall becompleted within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of thisorder.
Subject to the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of.As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.38053 of 2010filed by the petitioners for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous.
Date:31.12.2010VGB
(C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J)