Telangana High Court
WP/21387/2010 of G. Krishna Reddy Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation on 30 December 2013
A . RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.20593, 20608, 20609, 20611, 20617, 21387, 21390 and 21392 of 2010 Date: 30.12.2013 WP No.20593 of 2010: Between: V. Damodar Reddy … Petitioner And The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) Rep. by its Commissioner, Hyderabad &
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION Nos.20593, 20608, 20609, 20611, 20617, 21387,21390 and 21392 of 2010
Date: 30.12.2013
WP No.20593 of 2010:
Between:
V. Damodar Reddy
… Petitioner
And
The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC)Rep. by its Commissioner, Hyderabad & others … Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION Nos.20593, 20608, 20609, 20611, 20617, 21387,21390 and 21392 of 2010
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
This batch of writ petitions were filed challenging the orderspassed by the Chief City Planner, Town Planning Section, GHMC,Hyderabad, cancelling the LRS proceedings issued in favour of thepetitioners in respect of small extents of land standing in their namelocated in Vemana Colony in Sy.Nos.254, 255 & 256 of Chandanagar,Sherelingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy district.
2. Learned standing counsel for the respondents states that theLRS proceedings were cancelled, since the petitioners obtained thoseproceedings on misrepresentation of facts. But the learned counsel forthe petitioner states that no notices were issued to the petitioners before issuing the impugned orders.
3. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of theviolation of the principles of natural justice, the impugned proceedingsissued to the petitioners cancelling the earlier orders of regularizationof their plots are set aside and respondents 1 and 2 are directed toissue fresh notices to the petitioners, within a period of four (4) weeksfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the petitioners aregiven liberty to file their explanation to the said show cause notices.Respondents 1 and 2 shall consider the explanations submitted by thepetitioners and pass appropriate orders thereon, within a period ofeight (8) weeks thereafter. Status-quo shall be maintained by thepetitioners till passing of the appropriate orders by respondents 1 and2.
4. All the writ petitions are allowed accordingly. Pendingmiscellaneous petitions in this batch of writ petitions shall standclosed. No order as to costs.
_________________________
A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J
Date: 30.12.2013BSS
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO9
BSS
Date: 30.12.2013