Telangana High Court
WP/33465/1997 of A.Narayana Vs The Regional Transport Officer, on 31 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 33465 of 1997 Between: A.Narayana S/o. A . Narasaiah, R/o. Door No. 10 Market,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NO : 33465 of 1997
Between:
A.Narayana S/o. A . Narasaiah, R/o. Door No. 10 Market, Stisailam, Kurnool Dist.
AND
..... PETITIONER
The Regional Transport Officer, Nandyala, Kurnool Dist.
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a Writ, order or direction more particularly in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus,declaring the order of the respondent herein refusing to reduce the seating capacityas a 7 seator Motor Cab in respect of the petitioner's vehicle Bearing RegistrationNo. AP 16/H 7713, as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and further direct him toconvert the vehicle as Transport vehicle by reducing the seating capacity from 10 to7 by assigning pucca Registration No.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.JOHN RAJENDRA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR TRANSPORT
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
It is represented that the questions involved in this Writ Petition are covered by adecision of a Division Bench of our High Court in a case of O. Gangadhar Vs.Transport Commissioner, in W.P.No. 20335 of 1999 and Batch.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed as being covered by theaforesaid decision. No order as to costs.
-----------------------------
P.S. Narayana, J.
31[st] December, 2004.
KM
ASSISTANT REGISTRARSECTION OFFICER
// TRUE COPY //
To1. The Regional Transport Officer, Nandyala, Kurnool Dist.
2. 2CCs to G.P. for Transport, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)
3. 2CD copies
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
W.P.No. 33465 OF 1997
31stDecember, 2004