Telangana High Court
CRLP/10947/2009 of R.Dayanand Yadav, Vs The State of A.P., on 29 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 10947 of 2009 Between: 1 R.Dayanand Yadav, S/o. Komaraiah, R/o. H.No. 17-1-420, Shankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDYCRIMINAL PETITION NO : 10947 of 2009
Between:1 R.Dayanand Yadav, S/o. Komaraiah, R/o. H.No. 17-1-420, Shankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 2 R.Komaraiah, S/o. Late Venktswamy, R/o. H.No. 17-1-420, Shankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 3 R.Nirupa Rani, W/o. Komaraiah, R/o. H.No. 17-1-420, Shankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 4 Saritha, W/o. Mahender, R/o. H.No. 17-1-420, Shankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Hyderabad. 5 Navitha, W/o. M.Mahender, R/o. H.No. 17-1-420, Shankeshwar Bazar, Saidabad, Hyderabad.
6 T.Swathi, W/o. T.Mallesh,
R/o. H.No. 7-3-797/1, Brahmanadi, Yakuthpura, Hyderabad.
..... PETITIONER(S)
AND
1 The State of A.P., Central Crime Station, P.S., Hyderabad, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
2 Smt. R.Shalini, W/o. R.Dayanand Yadav, R/o. H.No. 18-5-890, Near Kotta Masisamma Temple, Laldarwaza, Hyderabad
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in thecircumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will bepleased toto quash the proceedings in cr.No. 67/2009 on the file of theW.P.S.Central Crime Station, DD.Hyderabad The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition andthe grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments ofMr.GANGA RAMI REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the PublicProsecutor, on behalf of the Respondent.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
PSR, J.
Crl.P.No. 10947of 2009
O r d e r:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learnedAdditional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
2. The de facto complainant/second respondent is present. Thede facto complainant produced Identity card bearing FNS 351093issued by the Election Commission of India, in proof of her identity.She reports that she is living along with her husband, first petitionerherein, as the matter is settled out of the court.
3. In the circumstances, as it is represented by the spouses thatthey are living together, the proceedings pending against thepetitioners herein in Cr.No.67 of 2009 on the file of the W.P.S., CentralCrime Station, D.D., Hyderabad are hereby quashed. The petition isaccordingly allowed.
4. However, in case of any harassment in future, the de factocomplainant/the second respondent herein is at liberty to file a freshcomplaint.
December 29, 2009.
*BVS
_______________________
P. SWAROOP REDDY, J.