Telangana High Court
WP/23720/2007 of Anam Venkata Ramana REddy Vs The Superintendent of Police, on 27 December 2007
R. SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23720 of 2007 Date: December 27, 2007 Between: Anam Venkata Ramana Reddy. … Petitioner And 1. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore District, Nellore and 2 others. … Respondents * * * ORDER: In this writ petition the petitioner seeks declaration
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.23720 of 2007
Date: December 27, 2007
Between:Petitioner
Anam Venkata Ramana Reddy. …
And
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Nellore District, Nellore and 2 others. …
Respondents
* * *
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
In this writ petition the petitioner seeks declaration by wayof Mandamus to declare the action of the second respondent in notcompleting the investigation in crime No.194 of 2005, as illegal andarbitrary.
2. The petitioner lodged a complaint dated 24[th] September2005 before the second respondent-Police. The gist of thecomplaint is that some persons have formed into an unlawfulassembly on the date of elections to Nellore Municipal Corporationand went on rampage near polling station installed at St. John’sHigh School. Based on the complaint of the petitioner, a case incrime No.194 of 2005 was registered for the offences underSections 147, 148, 323, 506, 452 and 427 read with 149 IPC.
3. It is the grievance of the petitioner that though such acomplaint was registered as early as on 24.9.2005, no final reporthas been filed as contemplated under Section 173 of Cr.P.C.
4. A counter-affidavit is filed on behalf of respondents statingthat after completion of investigation, charge sheet is already filedand the concerned magistrate also taken cognizance of the samein C.C.Nos.1177 and 1178 of 2007 and both the cases are pendingtrial.
5. As much as final report has already been filed and as thematter is pending trial, no further relief can be granted in this writpetition.
6. The writ petition is accordingly closed. No order as tocosts.
Date: December 27, 2007.BSB
______________________
(R. SUBHASH REDDY, J)