Telangana High Court
WP/26854/2006 of K.Vijayakumar, Vs The Commissioner of Endowments, on 27 December 2006
V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.26854 of 2006 Dated:27.12.2006 Between: K.Vijaya Kumar. …Petitioner and The Commissioner of Endowments, and others. …Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.26854 of 2006 ORDER: The petitioner herein is a lessee of House No.10
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26854 of 2006
Dated:27.12.2006
Between:K.Vijaya Kumar.…PetitionerandThe Commissioner of Endowments, and others.…RespondentHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAOWRIT PETITION No.26854 of 2006ORDER:
The petitioner herein is a lessee of House No.10 situated at R.N.Mada Street,Tirupathi. The house is owned by Sri Swamy Hathiramji Mutt, third respondentherein. In O.A.No.2 of 2003 filed by the second respondent, the second respondentin exercise of powers under Section 83 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and HinduReligious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (for short ‘the Act’), passed orderson 23.10.2006 directing eviction of the petitioner. Aggrieved by the same, thepetitioner preferred a revision petition under Section 92 of the Act before the firstrespondent. He also filed an application for stay of the order of the secondrespondent. As no orders are passed, the present Writ Petition is filed seeking adirection to the first respondent not to interfere with the possession of the subjectproperty.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments after getting instructionssubmits that the first respondent has entrusted the matter to the AdditionalCommissioner of Endowments, and that the matter stands posted to 20.01.2007.
Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court toapproach the Additional Commissioner for appropriate orders. Hence no furtherorders are necessary in the Writ Petition.
The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.
27.12.2006
vs
____________
(V.V.S.RAO, J)