Telangana High Court
WP/22082/1997 of Divisional Manager, APSRTC, Vs State Transport Appellate Tribunal, on 31 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.22082 of 1997 Between: Divisional Manager, APSRTC, Kakinada, E.G.Dist. ..... PETITIONER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.22082 of 1997
Between:
Divisional Manager, APSRTC, Kakinada, E.G.Dist.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 State Transport Appellate Tribunal, AP, Hyderabad, Rep by its Presiding Officer Hyderabad. 2 Regional Transport Authority, Kakinada, E.G.Dist., Rep by its Secretary,E.G.Dist 3 P.Satyanarayana, C/o Sri P.Rajagopalachary, Ramnagar, Hyderabad. Ramnagar, Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an appropriate writ, order or direction especially in the nature of a writ ofcertiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order dt.8.5.97 made inA.P.No.53/95 on the file of the 1st respondent allowing the appeal and setting asidethe order dt.28.12.94 in item No.2 in R.no.19119/A2/93 of the 2nd respondentrejecting the application of the 3rd respondent for grant of a pucca stage carriagepermit on the Rajahmundry town service route, A.P.H.B., colony to ladies hostel (via)Lalcheruvu etc., and directing issue of permit to the 3rd respondent for the said route,and quash the same as being illegal without jurisdiction and invalid as it is opposedto the provisions of sec.104 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SRINIVASA RAOCounsel for the Respondent Nos.1and 2: GP FOR TRANSPORT
The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is represented that the question involved in this writ petition is covered bythe decision of the full bench of this Court in A.P.S.R.T.C & others Vs. StateTransport Appellate Tribunal.In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.______________P.S.NARAYANA, JDated : 31[st] December, 2004.
Sh
To
1 The Presiding Officer,State Transport Appellate Tribunal, AP, Hyderabad. Hyderabad.
2 The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kakinada, E.G.Dist. E.G.Dist.
3. 2CCs to the G.P.for Transport, HighCourt Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT).
4. 2CD copies