Telangana High Court
WA/2067/2004 of Chintapudi Ramanamma Vs The Dist Collector on 27 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO : 2067 of 2004 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
HON'BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,
CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO : 2067 of 2004
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated18/11/2004 in WP NO : 21083 OF 2004 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
Chintapudi Ramanamma W/o.ChenchuramaiahKattuvapalli Village, Manubolu (M),Nellore Dist.
..... APPELLANT
AND
1 The Dist Collector Nellore Dist.
2 The Revenue Divisional Officer
Gudur, Nellore Dist.
3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Manubolu Village & Mandal, Nellore Dist.
Counsel for the Appellant : MR.G.TUHIN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE
.....RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT:
( per Hon’ble The Chief Justice )
……
Learned counsel for the appellant states that possession of the appellant wassought to be disturbed without complying with the provisions of law and reliedupon certain show-cause notices issued to third persons. Learned singleJudge dismissed the writ petition with the observation that it will be for thepetitioner to approach the concerned authorities with the explanation to theshow-cause notice raising pleas therein which she is entitled to and in caseauthorities are satisfied with the explanation of the petitioner-appellant,obviously her possession will not be disturbed. With such an order, we do notfind any ground to interfere. Accordingly this appeal is dismissed. No costs.
____________________
DEVINDER GUPTA. C.J.,
________________________B. SESHASAYANA REDDY. J., Dated: 27.12.2004.
VRK.
To
1 The Dist Collector
Nellore Dist.
2 The Revenue Divisional Officer
Gudur, Nellore Dist.
3 The Mandal Revenue Officer, Manubolu Village &
Mandal, Nellore Dist.
4. Two CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT).
5. Two CD copies.
HON’BLE SRI DEVINDER GUPTA,
CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SESHASAYANA REDDY.
W.A.NO. 2067 OF 2004.
( Judgment of the Bench delivered byHon’ble The Chief Justice )
Dt: 27.12.2004.