Telangana High Court
CRLP/10948/2009 of Basina Chandra Sekhara Satyanarayana Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO : 10948 of 2009 Between: Basina Chandra Sekhara Satyanarayana Rao S/o. Mallikarjuna Rao R/o. RRN Colony,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SWAROOP REDDYCRIMINAL PETITION NO : 10948 of 2009
Between:
Basina Chandra Sekhara Satyanarayana Rao S/o. Mallikarjuna Rao R/o. RRN Colony, Madanapalle, Chittoor Dist.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by the Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
2 Basina Teja Sri S/o. Chandra Sekhara Satyanarayana Rao R/o. Kothapet, Pedana, Krishna District.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Section ____ of Crl.P.C praying that in thecircumstances stated in the grounds filed therewith, the High Court will bepleased toto quash the proceedings in Crime No. 150 of 2009 of Pedana PoliceStation, Krishna District.
The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition andthe grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments ofMr.VENKATA RAMANA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the PublicProsecutor, on behalf of the Respondent.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
PSR, J.
Crl.P.No. 10948of 2009
O r d e r:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedAdditional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.2. Considering the circumstances, it is directed that thepetitioner shall not be arrested till filing of the charge sheet if any.However, the investigation into the case and consequentialproceedings based on the result of the investigation shall go on.4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
December 29, 2009.
*BVS
_______________________
P. SWAROOP REDDY, J.