Telangana High Court
CRLP/15395/2013 of Shaik Khaleel Ahammad Vs The State on 31 December 2013
SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.15395 of 2013 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seeking anticipatory bail for the petitioner/A1 in Cr.No.590/2013 on the file of Vijayawada I Town Police Station, Vijayawada City, registered for the offences
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.15395 of 2013
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. seekinganticipatory bail for the petitioner/A1 in Cr.No.590/2013 on the file ofVijayawada I Town Police Station, Vijayawada City, registered for theoffences punishable under sections 354 and 506 r/w.Sec.34 of IPC.
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/A1 and thelearned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the State.
It seems from the allegations made in the First Information Reportthat the petitioner/A1 and his elder brother developed grouse against the defacto complainant, who is the wife of A1 for filing cases against him underSection 498-A of IPC and also under the provisions of Protection of Womenfrom Domestic Violence Act. On 07.07.2013 at about 7.30 p.m it is allegedthat A1 and his brother came to the house of mother of the de factocomplainant where the de facto complainant was residing, abused them infilthy language and A2 caught hold of the hand of sister of the de factocomplainant and abused her in unparliamentary language, whereas A1 triedto kill the de facto complainant with her Chunni, abused her and threatenedher and her family members.
Having regard to the aforesaid allegations, I am not inclined to grantanticipatory bail to the petitioner/A1 notwithstanding of the fact that A2 wasgranted anticipatory bail earlier by this Court.
Accordingly the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
Date: 31.12.2013Dsr
_____________________
R.KANTHA RAO,J