Telangana High Court
WP/33358/2010 of G.Chenchu Ramaiah Vs AP Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., rep.by its on 30 December 2010
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TEN WRIT PETITION No.33358 of 2010 Between: G.Chenchu Ramaiah. … Petitioner. And Andhra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE,ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER,TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
WRIT PETITION No.33358 of 2010
Between:
G.Chenchu Ramaiah.
… Petitioner.
And
Andhra Pradesh Tourism DevelopmentCorporation Ltd., reptd., by its Chairmanand Managing Director, 3-5-891, TourismHouse, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad and another.
… Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner: Sri O.Manohar Reddy.Counsel for the respondents: Sri A.K.Narasimha Rao.
This Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
-ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declarethe action of the respondents in not considering thepetitioner’s representation, dated 6-12-2010, as illegal andarbitrary.
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitionerand the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, Iam of the opinion that the relief claimed by the petitioner isinnocuous as he is aggrieved by the non-disposal of hisrepresentation.
Accordingly, without going into the merits of thecase, respondent No.1 is directed to consider anddispose of the petitioner’s representation, dated 6-12-2010, in accordance with law, if not already done, within aperiod of one month from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order.
Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition isdisposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the WritPetition, WPMP Nos.42326 and 42327 of 2010 isdisposed of as infructuous.
------------------------------------
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY,JDate:30-12-2010MNR