Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/44308/2013 of MANDEEP KAUR AND ANR. Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 31 December 2013
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Crl.M.No.M-44308 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: December 31, 2013 Mandeep Kaur and another .....Petitioners v. The State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present: Petitioners in
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.
Crl.M.No.M-44308 of 2013(O&M)
Date of Decision: December 31, 2013
Mandeep Kaur and another
The State of Punjab and others
v.
.....Petitioners
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present:Petitioners in person withMr.Abhishek Jhamb, Advocate.
.....
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
The present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is forissuance of direction to respondent nos.2 and 3 to protect the life and libertyof the petitioners at the hands of respondent nos.4 to 6.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitionerswill be satisfied if respondent no.2, i.e., Senior Superintendent of Police,Moga, is directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law, onapplication, dated 30.12.2013, Annexure P5, already made to him bypetitioner no.1.
As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners aremajor. Date of birth of petitioner no.1-Mandeep Kaur, as per copy ofMatriculation Examination Certificate, Annexure P1, is 25.8.1990, and dateof birth of petitioner No.2-Pawandeep Singh, as per his affidavit, AnnexureP2, is 16.7.1993. They got married on 29.12.2013, as per marriagecertificate, Annexure P3. Photographs of the marriage are Annexure P4.
In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for thepetitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by thepetitioners, this petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2,i.e.,Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga, to take appropriate action, inaccordance with law, on application, dated 30.12.2013, Annexure P5,already stated to have been moved to him by petitioner no.1.
However, it is made clear that this order will be having noeffect on the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners and also on anyother civil or criminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as perlaw.
31.12.2013meenu
(Ram Chand Gupta)Judge