Telangana High Court

WP/14909/2020 of M/s.Hyderabad Rock Sand Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT) on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY , THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 14909 OF 2020 M/s.Hyderabad Rock Sand,

i

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA(Special Original Jurisdiction)FRIDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWOPRESENT

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDYWRIT PETITION NO: 14909 OF 2020

Between:

M/s.Hyderabad Rock Sand, Sy.No.14, Sultanpur (V) Patancheru,Mandal.Telangana- 502319 represented by its Proprietor C. SatyanarayanaReddy S/o. C. Sitaram Reddy,aJed about 63 years, residing at HyderabadReddy S/o. C. Sitaram Reddy,aJed about 63 years, residing at Hyderabad

..,PETITIONER

AND

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Secundrabad Division

2. Assistant Commissioner (CT), Audit, Nizamabad Division, Nizamabad

3. Commercial Tax Officer, Sangareddy, Nizamabad Division

4. State of Telangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

,..RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writof mandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No. 21877 daled 31-03-2018circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writof mandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No. 21877 daled 31-03-2018passed by the Respondent No. 2 and consequently the impugned ADC OrderNo. 980 dated 28-05-2020 passed by the Respondent No. 1 as being void,illegal, violative of Article 265and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution oflndia, totally without [jurisdiction ]and violative of the [principles ]of naturaljusticelA NO: 1 OF 2020No. 980 dated 28-05-2020 passed by the Respondent No. 1 as being void,illegal, violative of Article 265and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution oflndia, totally without [jurisdiction ]and violative of the [principles ]of naturaljusticelA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased ][to]stay all further [proceedings ]and consequential actions [pursuant ]to [the ][ADC]Order No. 980 dated 28-05-2020 [passed ]by the Respondent No. [1]Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M, NAGA DEEPAKcounsel for the Respondents: SRl. K. RAJI REDDY ,ScThe Court made the followlng: OROER

THE, II ]N'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHTTYANAND

THE I,ON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY

\/RIT PETITION No.l49O9 of 2O2O

ORDER: Pu [,L ]: rbn'ble tte CtLtcj,tt;Lice lJjlet Bhuyai)

Heard Mr. M.Naga Deepak, learned counsel for thepetitioner zrr d Mr. K.Raji Reddy, learned counsel for therespondents.

2. Learner I counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuantto One Tim : Settlement (OTS) Scheme introduced by theGovernment [, ]rf Telangana, petitioner has settled the tax disputewith the Stat:. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw thewrit petition.

3. In vier.' of the above, writ petition is dismissed onrvithdrarval.

Miscell. rneous applications pending, if any, sha1l stand closed. Hor,r,e ver, there shall be no order as to costs.

To,

I]S

Sd/-MOHD SANAULLAH [ANSARI]ASSISTANT REGISTRAR//TRUE COPY// 7iISECTION OFFICER

1. Two CCs to G [I ]FOR COMMERCIAL TAX ,High [Court ][for ][the State of]Telangana, at I {yderabad[OrJT]

2. One CC to SR M. NAGA DEEPAK, Advocate IOPUC]3. One CC to SR K. RAJI REDDY [(SC), ]Advocate IOPUC]3. One CC to SR K. RAJI REDDY [(SC), ]Advocate IOPUC]

4. Two CD copies

BM

HIGH COURT

DATED:30112t2022

ORDERWP.No.14909 of 2020

1[11c- ][STA][ re,](c13 o,tAlt 2[23.{\f*,<\)

DISMISSING T'HE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWALWITHOUT C;oSTS(sq\t\t \t

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead