Telangana High Court
WP/24496/2004 of Smt. N. Jhansi, Vs The Project Director, on 31 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 24496 of 2004 Between: Smt. N. Jhansi, W/o Satyanarayana, T.Narasapuram, W.G. District.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANUWRIT PETITION NO : 24496 of 2004
Between:
Smt. N. Jhansi, W/o Satyanarayana, T.Narasapuram, W.G. District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, W.G. District at Eluru.
2 The District Collector, E.G. District at Kakinada.
3 The Commissioner for Women, Empowerment, and Self Employment, A.P.
Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus, direct the respondents to dispose of the appeal of the petitioner dt. 20-11-2002 and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner intoservice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: VADDEMANI SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court at the admission stage made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
Writ Petition No.24496 of 2004
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner was dismissed from service by proceedings dated 13-05-2002. Thelearned counsel for the petitioner submits that appeal has been filed against theorder dated 13-05-2002. Therefore, the 3[rd] respondent, who is appellate authority,has to pass appropriate decision and orders on the appeal filed by the writ petitioner.
Hence, without entering into the merits of the case, it would suffice in the interest ofjustice to direct the 3[rd] respondent to dispose of the appeal dated 20-11-2002 filedby the petitioner.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3[rd] respondent todispose of the appeal dated 20-11-2002 filed by the petitioner within a period of twomonths from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
____________
K.C.BHANU, J.
To
1 The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, W.G. District at Eluru.
2 The District Collector, E.G. District at Kakinada.
3 The Commissioner for Women, Empowerment, and Self Employment, A.P.
Hyderabad.
4. 2CCs to G.P. for Revenue, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad, (OUT).
5. 2CD copies