Telangana High Court
WP/28860/2009 of Katkam Santosh Kumar Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its on 31 December 2009
MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28860 of 2009 ORDER: The petitioner states that he made a representation, dated 03- 11-2009, to the 2nd respondent alleging that the 3rd respondent is making construction without any permission in the immediate neighbourhood. His grievance is that
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDYWRIT PETITION No.28860 of 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner states that he made a representation, dated 03-11-2009, to the 2[nd] respondent alleging that the 3[rd] respondent is makingconstruction without any permission in the immediate neighbourhood. Hisgrievance is that no action has been taken thereon.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned StandingCounsel for the 2[nd] respondent.
In his representation, dated 03-11-2009, the petitioner stated that the3[rd] respondent is making construction without any permission and that thesame is likely to cause obstruction to flow of traffic as well as drainage water. The truth or otherwise thereof needs to be examined by the 2[nd] respondent. In case, any construction is made by the 3[rd] respondent without anypermission, necessary steps must be taken in accordance with the A.P.Municipalities Act, 1965.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent toconsider the representation of the petitioner, dated 03-11-2009, and takenecessary steps in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
___________