Telangana High Court
WP/25515/2003 of M/s.Modern Proteins Ltd., Vs Recover officer, on 10 December 2003
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) TUESDAY THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THREE : PRESENT : THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE: MOTILAL B. NAIK AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM W.P. No.25515 OF 2003 Between: 1.M/s. Modern
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
TUESDAY THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTHREE: PRESENT :THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE: MOTILAL B. NAIKAND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE: DALAVA SUBRAHMANYAM
W.P. No.25515 OF 2003
Between:
1.M/s. Modern Proteins Limited, A company registered under the Comopanies Act, 1956 Having its Registered Office at 1-12, Industrial Estate Kurnool, A.P. rep. by its Director, Sri Heeralal Jat S/o Nathuram Jat.
2.Sri Vinod Baid S/o Sri J.M. Baid,
Director, R/o 5, Lovelock Street, Kolkata.
AND
1.Recovery Officer,
Debt Recovery Tribunal, Room No.SFE/3/4, Nehru Place, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.Bank of Rajasthan Limited,
having its Registered Office at Clock Towers, Udaipur, Rajasthan and its Central Office at C-3, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur – 302 001.
3.Union of India through Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.
Petitioners
Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein, the High Court will be pleased toissue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.1 in putting up the properties ofthe Petitioners for proclamation of sale as arbitrary, illegal and violative of thePetitioner’s Fundamental Rights guaranteed to them as also in total abrogation ofpowers vested in the Respondent No.1 in the interest of justice.
The petition coming on for hearing as to admission, upon perusing the petitionand the affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.Milind G. Gokhale,Advocate for the Petitioners and the Standing Counsel for Central for the RespondentNo.3.
The Court made the following ORDER:
“During the course of hearing of the writ petition. We felt that we are to beassisted by a counsel.
Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, Advocate of this court, is appointed as Amicus Curiaeat our instance to assist this Court.
Office to furnish papers of this case to Mr.B. Adinarayana Rao, Advocate.
Let the matter come up on 10-12-2003.”
// TRUE COPY //
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1.Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, Advocate, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad. (BY SPL. MESSENGER ALONG WITH PAPERS OF THIS CASE) (BY SPL. MESSENGER ALONG WITH PAPERS OF THIS CASE)
:: 2 ::
2.The Recovery Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Room No.SFE/3/4, Nehru Place, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.The Bank of Rajasthan Limited,
having its Registered Office at Clock Towers, Udaipur, Rajasthan and its Central Office at C-3, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur – 302 001. Jaipur – 302 001.
3.The Ministry of Finance, Union of India, New Delhi.
4.The Section Officer, Writ Filing Section, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad.
5.The Section Officer, Posting Section, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
6.One spare copy.
H.A.
DRAFTED BY : H.A.COMPARED BY :
HIGH COURT
DR.MBNJ
NOTE : LET THE MATTERCOME UP ON 10-12-03
DT: 09-12-2003
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
W.P.NO.25515/03