Telangana High Court
WP/27477/2005 of K. Bhixapathi, Vs Deputy General Manager, C-P ANDA ( PLG AND ED), on 26 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.27477 of 2005 Dated 26-12-2005 Between: K.Bhixapathi and others. .. PETITIONERS AND The Deputy General Manager, C-P& A (PLG&ED) Bharath Dynamics Limited and another. .. RESPONDENTS ORDER The petitioners are unemployed women. They
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.27477 of 2005
Dated 26-12-2005
Between:
K.Bhixapathi and others.
.. PETITIONERS
AND
The Deputy General Manager,
C-P&A(PLG&ED)
Bharath Dynamics Limited and another.
.. RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The petitioners are unemployed women. They came to know that the firstrespondent is undertaking the appointment to the post of Helper. The firstrespondent did not issue any general notice inviting applications for that purpose.On the other hand, it is restricting the consideration of the same to the candidatessponsored by the second respondent Employment Exchange of Ranga ReddyDistrict. The petitioners seek a direction that their cases also be considered alongwith the candidates sponsored by the Employment Exchange. Reliance is placedupon the judgment of the Supreme Court in EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT,KRISHNA DISTRICT v. K.B.N.VISWESHWARA RAO.
The learned standing counsel for the respondents had resisted the plea of thepetitioners and relied upon a Division Bench judgment of this court in W.A.No.822 of2000, dated 10-06-2003, in THE CHIEF MANAGER, PERSONAL AND HRDSECTION, STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs. SMT.K.LAKSHMAMMA.
In Visweshwara Rao’s case (supra), the Supreme Court held that whenever a Stateagency undertakes employment into various categories of posts, in addition torequisitioning the names from the employment exchange, it should also call forapplications by publishing notification in the newspapers. The respondents are notable to state as to how the requirement indicated by the Supreme Court does notapply to the petitioners. The Division Bench of this court has dealt with a case,where the relevant service regulations provided for, restricted the consideration ofthe candidates to those who were sponsored through the Employment Exchange.Even assuming that the ratio laid down in that case is applicable to the facts of thiscase, it is not the case of the respondents that they have any rule which restrictedthe consideration of candidates only those who are sponsored through employmentexchange.
For the foregoing reasons, the writ petition is allowed and the second respondent is directed to consider the case of the petitioners without insisting on sponsoring by theEmployment Exchange, provided they fulfill the prescribed qualifications. No orderas to costs.
26-12-2005
_____________
Note:
Issue C.C. in two days.
(B/o)
Prv