Telangana High Court
WP/31502/2010 of G.Madhu Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh on 31 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No. 31502 of 2010 O R D E R: This Writ Petition has been filed for declaring the action of the 2nd respondent, Motor Vehicles Inspector, Mahabubnagar, in seizing the vehicle bearing Registration No. AP 22 U 5754, belonging to the writ
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAOWRIT PETITION No. 31502 of 2010
O R D E R:
This Writ Petition has been filed for declaring the action of the2[nd] respondent, Motor Vehicles Inspector, Mahabubnagar, in seizingthe vehicle bearing Registration No. AP 22 U 5754, belonging to thewrit petitioner, under Vehicle Check Report No. 0975477, dated29.11.2010 as illegal.
The 2[nd] respondent Motor Vehicles Inspector appears to havestopped the vehicle in question on 8.12.2010 and when the checkrevealed that the driver of the vehicle did not possess the validdriving licence and he also did not produce the necessarydocuments, such as the registration certificate, insurance policy, fitness certificate, etcetera, he seized the vehicle.
Heard Sri D.L.Pandu, learned counsel for the writ petitionerand the learned Government Pleader for Transport for therespondents.
Subject to payment of Rs.45,000/- (Rupees forty fivethousands only) by the writ petitioner and also executing anundertaking that he will not alienate the vehicle or create any thirdparty interests thereon or dismantle the vehicle in question and alsosubject to his undertaking that he will not allow the vehicle to be pliedby any person who does not possess a valid driving licence, theseized vehicle may be released in favour of the writ petitioner. Heshall also undertake to produce the same as and when required bythe authorities. However, the enquiry may go on.
With this, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.
-------------------------------------