Telangana High Court
WP/33476/2012 of V. Haritha Vs The A.P.S.R.T.C., rep by its Managing Director, on 30 December 2016
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33476 of 2012 ORDER: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the lis in the writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 30.01.2015, passed by this Court in WP.No.21665 of 2012 and batch and that same is not disputed by Sri
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33476 of 2012
ORDER:
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the lis in the writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 30.01.2015, passed by this Court in WP.No.21665 of 2012 and batch and that same is not disputed by Sri A.Rama Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation.
In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 30.01.2015 passed by this Court in WP.No.21665 of 2012 and batch. No order as to costs.
Office is to append a copy of the order in WP.No.21665 of 2012 and batch, dated 30.01.2015.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.
____________________________
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J30.12.2016 tk