Telangana High Court

WP/46233/2016 of N.Kotesh, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 29 December 2016

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.46233 of 2016 ORDER: Petitioner challenges the order of suspension of authorization, dated 19.11.2016, by filing appeal on 17.12.2016 before respondent No.2-Joint Collector, Kurnool. One of the grievances at present is that respondent No.2 is neither

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.46233 of 2016

Petitioner challenges the order of suspension of authorization, dated 19.11.2016, by filing appeal on 17.12.2016 before respondent No.2-Joint Collector, Kurnool. One of the grievances at present is that respondent No.2 is neither taking up the stay petition nor a date for hearing the appeal is given.

I have perused the material available on record and I am satisfied the grievance of petitioner is required to be noted and appropriate directions be issued.

1. Respondent No.2 is directed to fix a date for hearing of stay petition within two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and pass orders as are warranted in the fact situation of the case. of stay petition within two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and pass orders as are warranted in the fact situation of the case.

2. Respondent No.2 is further directed to hear and dispose of the appeal within three (3) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. dispose of the appeal within three (3) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

3. Petitioner is given liberty to communicate copy of the order to respondent No.2 within one week from today. order to respondent No.2 within one week from today.

Writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

________________

S. V. BHATT, J

Dt:29.12.2016

kdl

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead