Telangana High Court
WP/24656/2004 of K. Hari Chandra, Vs The Regional Manager, APSRTC, on 29 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 24656 of 2004 Between: K.Hari Chandra, S/o.Lakshmi Narasimha Sastry, Conductor,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 24656 of 2004
Between:
K.Hari Chandra, S/o.Lakshmi Narasimha Sastry, Conductor, F.80198, Aged about 52 years, R/o.Anjeneya Swamy Temple, Ayyagaripeta, Sathupally, Khammam District.
AND
1. The Regional Manager, APSRTC,
Khammam Region, Khammam District.
..... PETITIONER
2. The Senior Manager (O)/Khammam,APSRTC, Khammam District.
3. The Depot Manager, APSRTC,
Sathupally Bus Depot, Khammam istrict.
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleasedto issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the 3[rd] respondent in issuing the proceedingsNo.PA/95(103)/94-SPL dated 11-08-1994 as illegal, arbitrary and unjust andconsequently set aside the proceedings No.PA/95(103)/94-SPL dated 11-08-1994 issued by the 3[rd] respondent.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Y.Subbarao.
The Court at the admission stage, made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 24656 of 2004
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The review petition challenging the very same impugned proceedings is said tobe pending before the 1[st] respondent-reviewing authority for consideration.However, for disposal of the review petition, the petitioner made arepresentation dated 07-06-2003 before the 1[st] respondent. But the same hasnot yet been considered by the 1[st] respondent.
2. Therefore, I deem it consider to dispose of the writ petition with a direction tothe 1[st] respondent to dispose of the review petition.
3 . Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1[st]respondent to pass appropriate orders on the review petition filed by thepetitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. In the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.
December 29, 2004
___________________
To
1. The Regional Manager, APSRTC,Khammam Region, Khammam District.Khammam Region, Khammam District.
2. The Senior Manager (O)/Khammam,APSRTC, Khammam District.APSRTC, Khammam District.
3. The Depot Manager, APSRTC,Sathupally Bus Depot, Khammam istrict.Sathupally Bus Depot, Khammam istrict.