Telangana High Court
CMA/468/2001 of Kotagiri Venkata Ravi Shankar Vs Kotagiri Vijayalaxmi on 29 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD C.M.A.Nos.468 of 2001 and 1811 of 2001 C.M.A.No.468 of 2001 Between: Kotagiri Venkata
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWOTHOUSAND AND NINE
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASADC.M.A.Nos.468 of 2001 and 1811 of 2001C.M.A.No.468 of 2001
Between:Kotagiri Venkata Ravishankar….. AppellantANDKotagiri Vijayalaxmi…… RespondentC.M.A.No.1811 of 2001Between:Kotagiri Venkata Ravishankar….. AppellantANDKotagiri Vijayalaxmi…… Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD
C.M.A.Nos.468 of 2001 and 1811 of 2001
JUDGMENT:(Per B.Prakash Rao, J)
Both parties are present in person and their counsel arealso present. Both parties have filed memorandum of compromisehaving compromised the matter at the instance of elders byagreeing the terms specified therein. It was agreed between theparties that the appellant-husband shall pay different amounts atdifferent points of time as mentioned therein and the respondent-wife shall withdraw the maintenance case and the criminal casesfiled by her against the appellant-husband and the respondent-wifeshall not have any claim whatsoever against the appellant inrespect of the properties or any other matter arising out of themarriage. After examining the both parties, they agreed the termsof compromise mentioned therein and admitted the same as true.
Therefore, In view of such compromise between the parties,these appeals are disposed of in terms thereof granting divorcebetween the parties by dissolving the marriage between them on 20-08-1994.
__________________
B.PRAKASH RAO, J
Date: 29-12-2009Ksn
_____________________
G.BHAVANI PRASAD, J