Telangana High Court
WP/27247/2005 of Alladi Susheelamma, Vs The District Collector, on 27 December 2005
MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.27247 of 2005 Dated:27.12.2005 Between: Alladi Susheelamma, W/o.Late.Krishna Murthy, R/o.D.No.252, Doddapuram Veedi, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND The District Collector, Chittoor District, and another. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON'BLE MR
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.27247 of 2005
Dated:27.12.2005
Between: Alladi Susheelamma, W/o.Late.Krishna Murthy, R/o.D.No.252, Doddapuram Veedi, Tirupathi, Chittoor District...... PETITIONERAND The District Collector, Chittoor District, and another......RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
WRIT PETITION No.27247 of 2005
The petitioner claims that she was granted patta in respect of the land admeasuringAc.0.15 cents in Survey No.231/2P within the limits of Tirupathi Rural Mandal,Chittoor District, under the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition andConversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956. She further states that she approached thesecond respondent on 23.09.2005 requesting for demarcation of the boundaries ofthe said land, in vain. Therefore, the present writ petition is filed seeking, inter alia, adirection to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and passappropriate orders.
After getting instructions in the matter, the learned Assistant Government Pleader forRevenue (General) submits that the petitioner was never granted any patta asalleged, and that it is a bogus patta. He, however, does not dispute or deny that therepresentation dated 23.09.2005 made by the petitioner is still pending.
Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law on the representation of thepetitioner referred to hereinabove within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
____________
(V.V.S.RAO, J)
27.12.2005
vs