Telangana High Court
WA/2454/2005 of Om Prakash Sidh, Vs Union of India, rep. by Deputy Inspector General of Police, on 14 December 2005
MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO and THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT APPEAL NO.2454 of 2005 (Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 29.11.2005 in W.P.M.P.No.31578 of 2005 in W.P.NO.24567 OF 2005 on the file of the High Court.) Between: Om Prakash Sidh,
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO
and
THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU
WRIT APPEAL NO.2454 of 2005
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated29.11.2005 in W.P.M.P.No.31578 of 2005 in W.P.NO.24567 OF 2005 on the file ofthe High Court.)
Between:
Om Prakash Sidh, S/o. Lekh Ram Sidh, 23 years,R/o. H.No. 9-2-641, Regimental Bazar, Secunderabad.
AND
...APPELLANT
1. Union of India, rep. by Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Southern Sector, Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad.
2. The Commandant, Central Reserve Police Force, Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO
And
THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU
WRIT APPEAL NO.2454 OF 2005
JUDGMENT:(Per the Hon’ble Mr Justice B.Prakash Rao)
Heard both the sides.
Page 1 of 2
At their request, the Writ Appeal itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage.The appellant/writ petitioner filed this appeal seeking to assail the order dated29.11.2005 in W.P.M.P.No.31578 of 2005 in W.P.No.24567 of 2005, wherein thelearned Single Judge ordered Notice Before Admission. The main grievance of theappellant is that even though he has satisfied with the conditions and the domicilerequired, his case has not been considered and his application was sought to berefused. The learned Single Judge ordered Notice Before Admission and posted thematter after two weeks as per the order dated 29.11.2005.
Having heard the counsel on either side and on perusal of the materialavailable on record, it is seen that in view of the fact that the appeal is filed only against the order with regard to the notice at the stage of admission, necessarily it calls for an opportunity to either side, as it is only an interlocutory order. Hence, we do not find any merits in the above appeal.
The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
However, the respondents shall file counter in the Writ Petition within one week from today. Office to post the matter accordingly.
_________________
(B.PRAKASH RAO, J)
___________________
(DR G.YETHIRAJULU, J)
14[th] December 2005
RRB
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…