Telangana High Court
CC/163/2017 of Amaragonda Lachamma Vs Sri B.Padmaiah, on 29 December 2023
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1 63 0F 2017 Contempt case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Cou(s Act 1971 to punish the
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1 63 0F 2017
Contempt case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Cou(s Act 1971to punish the Respondent herein for their willful disobedience of the ordersto punish the Respondent herein for their willful disobedience of the ordersdt.2311112016 in WP No.40523 ot 2016.
Between:
Amaragond-a- Lachamma, w/o Komaraiah, aged about 65 years, rio Choppadandivillage and Mandal, Karimnagar District_village and Mandal, Karimnagar District_
...PETITIONER/PETITIONER
AND
1Sri B.Padmaiah,, Tahsildar, Choppadandi Mandal, Karimnagar District.
..RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO. 3
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl. KALVALA SANJEEV
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI [JUSTICE ][J. ][SREENTVAS ][RAO]CONTEMFT CASE[No.163 of2OL7]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The contempt [case ][is ][filed ][seeking ][to ][punish ][the]
under [Sections ][1O ][to ][12 ][of ][the ][Contempt of Courts]respondent Act, lg7 l, for deliberate [and willful ][disobedience in]impiementing the [order ][passed ][by ][this ][Court ][in ][W'P'No'40523]of 20 16. dated [23.11.2O16.]
No representation representation [[on ][behalf ][of ][the ][petitioner ][in ]][[behalf ][of ][the ][petitioner ][in ]][[of ][the ][petitioner ][in ]][[the ][petitioner ][in ]][[petitioner ][in ]][[in ]][[the]]
2. No representation representation [[on ][behalf ][of ][the ][petitioner ][in ]][[behalf ][of ][the ][petitioner ][in ]][[of ][the ][petitioner ][in ]][[the ][petitioner ][in ]][[petitioner ][in ]][[in ]][[the]]morning and alternoon [sessions. ][Heard ][learned ][Assistant]Government Pleader [for ][Revenue ][appearing ][on ][behalf ][of]responclettt.
3. This Court while [disposing ][the writ ][petltlon ][on]23.11.2016, directed [the ][3'd ][respondent ][to ][dispose ][of ][the]dated [01.02.2016 ][made ][by the ][petitioner]representation to enter [his ][name ][in ][the ][revenue ][records ][in ][respect ][of]seeking the land admeasuring [Ac.0.31 ][guntas ][in ][Sy'No' ][1343/A]sit uated at Choppadandi [Village ][and ][Mandal, ][Karimnagar]District, in accordance [with ][law, ][at ][the earliest']
l
4. Learned Assistant Government pleader basing on theinstructions submits that, the respondent complied with theorder passed by this Court in W.p.No.40523 of 20 16, dated23.1t.2016.
5In view of the above submissron, no further adjudicationis required.is required.
6. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. However, thepetitioner is granted riberty to avail the remedies as areavailable under law, if so advised.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall standclosed.
Sd/- Ch. VenkateswarluDEPUWdTEGJSTRARsEcflMoFFIcERDEPUWdTEGJSTRARsEcflMoFFIcER
//TRUE COPY//
To,1 . Sri B.Padmaiah, Tahsildar, Choppadandi Mandal, Karimnagar District.1 . Sri B.Padmaiah, Tahsildar, Choppadandi Mandal, Karimnagar District.?. [gne ]9C [ro ][Sri. ][Katvara ][Sanjeev, ]['eO**t" ]4. 3. Two Two CCs to CD CopiesGp for Revenr.re, Xbn Corrt foriIe IOpUbi'-""'-Sia1e ot fehngana. [OUTI4. 3. Two Two CCs to CD CopiesGp for Revenr.re, Xbn Corrt foriIe IOpUbi'-""'-Sia1e ot fehngana. [OUTI
SR
$
HIGH COURTJSR, JDATED:29/1212023(
ORDERCC.No.163 of 2017
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
@q'3s,t*'
1HE [S14]14:okc'oo2 3 rtt'n [yn74]to)6spATCrEo