Telangana High Court
WP/38714/2013 of Smt. M. Shailaja Devi Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh on 31 December 2013
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN PRESENT THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 38714 OF 2013 Between: Smt. M. Shailaja Devi
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OFDECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 38714 OF 2013
Between:
Smt. M. Shailaja Devi
AND
..... Petitioner
The Government of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. by its Principal Secretary,Municipal Administration,Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others
.....Respondents
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta)
After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we gathered that identical issue has been disposed of byorder of this Court in W.P. No. 38039 of 2013 dated26.12.2013.
Accordingly, we pass similar order in this writpetition directing the respondent – MunicipalCorporation to keep the impugned demand forpayment of property tax in abeyance until a decisionin terms of this order is taken. The Corporation shallserve notice to the petitioner to take a decision on therepresentation made by the petitioner. In spite ofsuch notice, if the petitioner does not turn up, theorder passed by us today will stand recalled and thedemand for payment of property tax at enhanced ratewill stand revived. In the event the petitioner turns upfor hearing, she should be heard and thereafter aspeaking order shall be passed. In the process, theoriginal valuation as well as fixation of property taxmay be modified/varied as the situation warrants. Theentire exercise shall be completed within six weeksfrom the date of communication of this order. In themeantime, the petitioner shall pay the property tax inthe demand as per the old valuation. This paymentwill abide by the result of decision to be taken by theCorporation on the representation of the petitioner.We make it clear that we have not observed anythingon the merits of the case.
With the above directions, the writ petition isdisposed of. There will be no order as to costs.
Consequently, W.P.M.P. No.48135 of 2013 filedby the petitioner for interim relief stands closed.
______________________
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.
December 31, 2013MAS
______________
Sanjay Kumar, J.