Telangana High Court
WP/26829/2006 of Jamme Balaiah Vs The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, on 27 December 2006
SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO WRIT PETITION No.26829 of 2006 Dated: 27.12.2006 Between: Jamme Balaiah and others. ..... PETITIONERS AND The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and another. .....RESPONDENTS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO WRIT PETITION No.26829
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26829 of 2006
Dated: 27.12.2006
Between:
Jamme Balaiah and others.
AND
..... PETITIONERS
The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga ReddyDistrict, and another.
.....RESPONDENTS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S. RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26829 of 2006
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is wholly misconceived. The petitioners seek adirection to respondent No.2, namely, the Village Secretary, AdibatlaVillage, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal in Ranga Reddy District. By memodated 21.03.2006, respondent No.1 directed respondent No.2 to changethe necessary entries in the revenue records for the year 2005-2006 inpossession column, on consideration of an application filed by thepetitioners. The complaint in this writ petition is that respondent No.2 isnot implementing the orders of respondent No.1. If respondent No.2 isdoing so, nothing prevents the petitioner to go to respondent No.1 andlodge a complaint with the District Collector (Vigilance Cell) forappropriate action. In such a matter a Writ cannot be issued.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
_____________
(V.V.S.RAO, J)
27[th] December, 2006ghn