Telangana High Court
WP/25045/2004 of Ch. L.N. Murthy (E.No. 454941), Vs The A.P. State Road Transport Corporation, on 31 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 25045 of 2004 Between: Ch. L.N. Murthy (E.No. 454941), Ch. V. Kantha Raju, R/o. Near
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 25045 of 2004
Between:
Ch. L.N. Murthy (E.No. 454941),
Ch. V. Kantha Raju, R/o. Near
Durgalamma Temple, Sabbavaram,
Visakhapatnam,Visakhapatnam District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
The A.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Rep by its Regional Manager, Visakhapatnam,Visakhapatnam District.
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider and dispose of thePetitioner's Review Petition dated 11-8-2004 filed against the order of removalwithout any further and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitionerinto service forthwith with all consequential benefits including back wages etc.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.CHALLARI NAGESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent: KUM.B.G.UMA DEVI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
For not considering the petitioner’s Review petition dated 11.8.2004, the present writpetition is filed.
2. Challenging the disciplinary proceedings dated 09.6.2004, the writ petitionerpreferred appeal before the Appellate Authority and the same was dismissed byproceedings dated 22.7.2004. Challenging the same a review petition was filedbefore the Regional Manager, Visakhapatnam and the same is stated to be pending.Appropriate decision has to be taken by the respondent in accordance with law andrules and regulations of the Corporation.
3. Therefore, a direction is given to the respondent to take appropriate decision andto pass an order on the Review Petition of the petitioner in accordance with rulesand regulations of the Corporation within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs.
Date: 31[st] December 2004.
BSB
____________
K.C.BHANU,J.
ASSISTNAT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Regional Manager,
A.P. State Road Transport Corporation,
Visakhapatnam District.
2. Two C.D. copies