Telangana High Court
WP/25291/2009 of M/S DISH TV INDIA LTD Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, on 31 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 25291 of 2009 Between: M/S DISH TV INDIA LTD 6-2-929 DB Enclave Behind BPCL Petrol
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 25291 of 2009
Between:
M/S DISH TV INDIA LTD 6-2-929 DB Enclave Behind BPCL Petrol Pump, Opp. to Usha Division Office, Khairatabad,Rep.by its Assistant Manager-Marketing Mr.N.Narendranath Reddy,S/o. N.Narayan Reddy Age(30) Years Hyderabad Dist
..... Petitioner
AND
1 The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep.by its Commissioner, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 2 The Additional Commissioner(T&T)
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 3 The Additional Commissioner(Advt), Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 4 M/s USM Business Systems Pvt Ltd., 1-8-319/2 Patigadda Road, Behind Ford Showroom, Begumpet, Secunderbad
.....Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstancesstated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriatewrit, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring theproceedings of the commissioner and Special Officer, GHMC the 1st Respondent in ProcNo 245/ADI/Advt/GHMC/2009/429-02, Dt 24-12-2008 issued by the AdditionalCommissioner (T&T) GHMC the 2nd respondent herein and the demand notices Dt 04-03-2009 issued by the 4th respondent demanding the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs4,37,615/ towards advertisement fee, as illegal and void in violation of the provisions of theHyderabad Municipal Corporation Act 1955.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed insupport there of and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M.V.J.K.KUMAR, Advocate for thePetitioner and Sri R.Ramachandra Reddy, SC for GHMC for the Respondent Nos, 1 to 3,the Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Post on 30.11.2009 in Motion List.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1 The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 2 The Additional Commissioner(T&T)
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 3 The Additional Commissioner(Advt), Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad 4 M/s USM Business Systems Pvt Ltd., 1-8-319/2 Patigadda Road, Behind Ford Showroom, Begumpet, Secunderbad(RR 1 to 4 by RPAD)
5. One CC to Sri M.V.J.K.Kumar, Advocate, (OPUC)
6. One spare copy.
HIGH COURT
LNRJ
DT.20.11.2009
POST ON 30.11.2009 IN MOTION LIST.
ORDER
WP NO. 25291/2009
INTERIM STAY.
Drafted by JUDt. 25.11.2009.
HIGH COURT
DT.20.11.2009
POST ON 30.11.2009 IN MOTION LIST.
ORDER
WP NO. 25291/2009
INTERIM STAY.