Telangana High Court
WP/28773/2009 of Shree Shirdi Sai Baba Lodging Vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation on 31 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 28773 of 2009 Between: Shree Shirdi Sai Baba Lodging, rep. by its
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 28773 of 2009
Between:
Shree Shirdi Sai Baba Lodging, rep. by its Proprietor, Sri Rakesh Jaiswal, H.No. 4-8-27/28/1 to 4, Putli Bowli, Hyderabad.
..... Petitioner
AND
1.The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by the Commissioner, Hyderabad.
2.USM Business Systems Pvt. Ltd., 1-8-319/2, Patigadda Road, Begumpet, Secunderabad.
.....Respondents.
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue awrit order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring theimpugned demand notice Dt : 24.04.2009 issued by the 1[st] respondent as arbitrary, illegal,in violation of the principles of natural justice and in violation of the mandatory statutoryprovisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and in violation of Article 14,19 (1) (g) and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and ; consequently set aside the same.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and theaffidavit filed in support there of and upon hearing the arguments of SRI P. THIRUMALARAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri R. Ramesh Reddy-SC on behalf of respondent,the Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
“Post on 31.12.2009 in the Motion List under the caption “For Judgment”.
In the meanwhile, there shall be interim stay as prayed for.”
// TRUE COPY //
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by the Commissioner, Hyderabad.
2. USM Business Systems Pvt. Ltd., 1-8-319/2, Patigadda Road, Begumpet, Secunderabad.
(Addressee Nos. 1 & 2 by RPAD)
3. One CC to Sri P. THIRUMALA RAO, Advocate(OPUC)
4. One CC to Sri R. Ramesh Reddy, Advocate(OPUC).
5. One spare copy.
TKK
HIGH COURT
LNR.J
DT.29-12-2009.
ORDER
W.P.No. 28773 of 2009.
W.P.NO. 28773 of 2009.
INTERIM STAY
DRAFTED BY TKK
DT.30-12-2009.
HIGH COURT
LNR.J
DT.29-12-2009.
Note :- Post on 31.12.2009 in the Motion List under the caption “For Judgment.
ORDER
W.P.No. 28773 of 2009.
W.P.NO. 28773 of 2009.
INTERIM STAY