Telangana High Court

CC/2283/2022 of T.Laveena Jyothi Vs Sri Somesh Kumar, I.A.S on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2283 OF 2022 Contempt case U/s 10 to 1 2 of Contempt of Courts Act to Punish the Respondents herein for violating,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2283 OF 2022

Contempt case U/s 10 to 1 2 of Contempt of Courts Act to Punish theRespondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated1110212022 in lA. No. 2 of 2022, W.P. No. 7447 o'f 2O22.

Between:

T. Laveena Jyothi, Age about 52 years, ZPHS School , Andole, Andole (M),Sanga Reddy District.

...PETITIONERYWRIT PETITIONER

AND

Sri Somesh Kumar, l.A.S, S/o Not to the petitioner The State of TelanganaChief Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENT

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRl. MEESALA VINOD KUMAR

Counsel forthe Respondent: GP FOR SERVICES-I

The Court made the fol{owing: ORDER

TIIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUi4AR

Contempt Case No,2283 of 2022

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The present Contempt Case is filed alleging disobeclience to the orderpassed by this Court in I.A.No.2 of 2022 in W.P"ltlo.7447 of 2022,dt.tr.02.2022.

2. Learned iovernment Pleader for Services I :.ubmits that therespondents havr now complied with the above said order of this Couft, videMemo No.Spl./Se:retary Peshi/2021-352, dt.13.05.2022 rej:c:ting the case ofthe [petitioner, ]an 1 therefore, prays for closure of the cont({npt case. A copyof the same is served on the learned counsel for the [petitioner ]across the Barand also is placed on record of this Court.

3. Having reg,rrd to the fact that the above order of thrs Court has beencomplied with by he respondents, there is no disobedience, muctl less willfuldlsobedience, to tt e order of this Court, on the part of the responcents.

4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.

5. Miscellaneorrs petitions, if any, pending shall stand clo:;r:d.

Sd/.CH. [\/ENKATESWARLU]oto'*-IF9l.tlSll[;ECTION OFFICER

//TRUE COPY//

To,

1. Two CCs to G [) ]for Services l, High Court for the Sta e of Telangana atHyderabad [OU'-]Hyderabad [OU'-]

2. One CC to SRL MEESALA VINOD KUMAR Advocate [OpJ(]l

3. Two CD Copies

Vli

d

HIGH COUR..TVK, J

DATED: 3011212022

\ORDERCC.No.2283 of 202221

Closing the C ontempt Case./{ )0np)rrt-)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead