Telangana High Court

WP/33192/2024 of Mrs. B. Jyothsna Vs State of Telangana on 31 December 2024

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL ANDO THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI WRIT PETITION NO: 33192 OF 2024 Between: Mrs. B.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAULANDOTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

WRIT PETITION NO: 33192 OF 2024

Between:Mrs. B. Jyothsna, Wo. E. Satish, Aged about 48 [years, H.No.16-9-610 ][and]6'1 1, Flat No.1O1 , Kala Classic Apartment, Oid [ltz{alakpet, ][Hyderabad]

...PETITIONER

AND

'1 . State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, General AdminKtratio!'(SR) Department, Government of Telangana, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad. (SR) Department, Government of Telangana, TS Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal [Secretary, General]Administration (SR) Department, Government of [Andhra Pradesh AP]Secretariat, Amaravathi, VijayawadaAdministration (SR) Department, Government of [Andhra Pradesh AP]Secretariat, Amaravathi, Vijayawada

3. lnstitution of Lokayukta of Telangana, H.No.5-9-49, Basheer [Bagh,]Hyderabad-63. Represented by its Registrar.Hyderabad-63. Represented by its Registrar.

4. lnstitution of Lokayukta of Andhra Pradesh, Door [No ]9613-72-124:l , [Prasad's]Complex, Santosh Nagar Colony, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh-s18006.Represented by its Registrar.Complex, Santosh Nagar Colony, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh-s18006.Represented by its Registrar.

.,RESPONDENTS"'

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of [lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the [High Court may ][be]pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ [(1)declaring ]G.O . [M ]s. [No ][.161,]General Administration Department of the [State ]of [A.P., ][daled ][31 ][.12.2019]allocatlng the posts and employees of the [lnstitution ][of ][Lokayukta between ][the]States of Telangana and the residuary State of [A.P. is ][in contravention ][of ]82 of the A.P. Re-organization Act, 2O14 and consequently [set ][aside ][the ][same.]2)Direct the respondent Nos-3 and 4 to allocate the [posts and the personnel in ][the]

I

Institution of the Lokayukta of the combined State of Andhra [Pradesh ][as ][on]02-06.2O14 for the [purpose ]of allocation to two successor States [in ]accordancewith Section 82 of the A.P. Re-organization Act,2014.

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that in the circumstances stated [in]the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may be [pleased ]to directthe respondent Nos.3 and 4 to constitute a Joint Committee [for ]allocation [of ][the]employees of the lnstitution of the Lokayukta for the combined State of AndhraPradesh within a t me frame and till such time not to effect any further [promotions.]

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MAYUR REDDY, SENIOR COUNSELAPPEARING FOR MS. K. BHARGAVI, Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR GENERALADMINISTRATION

Counsel for the Respondent No.3 and 4:--The Court made the following: ORDER

I

l

THE HOITOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL

AND

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RAIII

WRIT PETITION No.33192 of2024

ORDER:Hon'b\e Si Justice Sujog paul)

Sri Mayrr Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing forMs.K.Bhargavi, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks towithdraw this petition with liberty to file a properly constitutedwrit petition.

2. The other side has no objection.

3. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as withlrawnwith liberty prayed for. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.SD/. T. JJASSISTANT REGIREGI//TRUE COPY//I\

SD/. T. JJEASSISTANT REGIREGI//TRUE COPY//\sEcTloN oFFlcER#'.

To'1. On" CC to Ms. K. Bhargavi, Advocate IOPUCIi: i*o CCs to [GP ][for ][Gen"eral ][Administralion, ][High Court for ][the ][State ][of]Telangana, At Hyderabad [OUT]3. Two CD CopiesTJGJPPrq HIGH COUIRT

DATED:31 11212024

ORDERWP.No.33192 of 2024

:i*,1'r,( 7t.)703 nln [s[]\1,AIC

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETTTION AS WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTSWITHOUT COSTS

Pmq,1>\'1-{

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead