Telangana High Court
WP/7102/2009 of Nawab Mohd. Naseeruddin Khan, Vs The Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District, on 29 December 2023
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO wRtT PET|T|ON NO. 7102 0F 2009 Between: Nawab Mohd. Naseeruddin Khan, S/o. Late lvlohd,
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
wRtT PET|T|ON NO. 7102 0F 2009
Between:
Nawab Mohd. Naseeruddin Khan, S/o. Late lvlohd, Badruddin Khan, Business, Rl/o.Flat No. 104, Laxmi Gardens, Street No.3, West Marredpally, Secunderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
1.The Joint Collector-|, Ranga Reddy District, At Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, R.R. District, at Attapur,Hyderabad.Hyderabad.
3K. Madhusudhan Rao, S/o. K. Radha Krishna Murthy, Aged about 63 Years, 4K. Bhavani Sankara Rao, Sio. K. Radha Krishna Murthy, Aged about 65Years,Years, Jasti Lakshmayya, S/o. J. Butchayya, Aged about 65 Years,
Smt. Annapurna Devi, W/o. N. Chittaranjan, Aged about 75 years,
(Respondents No.3 to 6 are rep. by their G.P.A. Holder D. Seshagiri Rao, S/o.D. Paradeshi, Aged about 78 Years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. Plot No.893, RoadNo.46, Jubille Hills Colony, Hyderabad.)
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of CERTIORARI by quashing the lmpugned Order in Case No. F|l2878l2OOBdaled 23-08-2008 and consequentially set asade the Orders in Case No.F11508212008, dated 03-01-2009 passed by the [.1st ]respondent, by calling therecords.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MUDDU VIJAY FORMr. MAHMOOD ALI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 to 6: - The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI .TUSTICE J. SREENIVAS [RAO]
WRIT PETITION No.71O2 of 2OO9
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing,Sri Mahmood Alilearned counsel for the petitionersubmits that the cause in the writ petition does not survivefor adjudication.
2. Recording the said submission, the WritPetition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, il any, shallstand closed.
SD/.MOHD.ISMAILASSISTANT [R][GISTRAR]SECTIOOFFICER
//TRUE COPY'
To,
'1. One CC to Mr. MAHMOOD ALl, Advocate IOPUCI2.TwoCCstoGPforRevenue,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaatHyderabad [OUTj3. Two CD CoPies MPSB&^
HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
1[t{E ][R ][T4]I€(ic(J0 5 FtB [2024]z\*+ l)EspAjrf,t..+,ORDERWP.No.7102 of 2009
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTUOUSWITHOUT COSTS