Telangana High Court
SA/246/2005 of A. Nagesh Vs Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation on 31 December 2013
SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY SECOND APPEAL No.246 of 2005 December 31, 2013 Between: A.Nagesh, S/o.A.Venkatarao And another … Appellants/ Appellants/Plaintiffs AND Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Represented by its Commissioiner, Visakhapatnam … Respondent/
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
SECOND APPEAL No.246 of 2005
December 31, 2013
Between:
A.Nagesh, S/o.A.VenkataraoAnd another
… Appellants/Appellants/Plaintiffs
AND
Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation,Represented by its Commissioiner, Visakhapatnam … Respondent/Respondent/Defendant THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
SECOND APPEAL No.246 of 2005
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
Sri P.Rajasekhar, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that thestructures were demolished by the respondent during the pendency of thissecond appeal; and therefore, cause of action does not survive. The same isrecorded.
2. Hence, this second appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
3. The miscellaneous petitions if any pending in this second appeal shall standclosed.closed.
December 31, 2013.
YS
__________________________
(T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J)