Telangana High Court
CRLP/15275/2013 of Smt.Neelamma Vs The State of AP., on 31 December 2013
COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN :PRESENT: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRL.P. NO:15275 of 2013 Between: 1 Smt.Neelamma W/o Sudhakara Chary 2 Vadla Sudhakaar chary S/o Manaiah 3 Smt.Nagalakshmi W/o
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABADTUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
:PRESENT:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAOCRL.P. NO:15275 of 2013
Between:
1 Smt.Neelamma W/o Sudhakara Chary
2 Vadla Sudhakaar chary S/o Manaiah
3 Smt.Nagalakshmi W/o Sidda Chary
4 Sidda Chary W/o Vishwanatham
AND
..... Petitioners/Accused 2 to 5
The State of AP., Through Police, Balanagar, Rep by its PublicProsecutorHigh Court of AP., Hyderabad
.....Respondent/Complainant
Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying that inthe circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioners on bail inthe event of their arrest in Crime No.233/2013 of PS., BalanagarMahabubnagar District.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing thepetition and the grounds filed herein and upon hearing the argumentsof Sri M.Achuta Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Addl.Public Prosecutor for the Respondent, the Court made the following.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
“This criminal petition is filed by the petitioners-A2 to A5under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code seekinganticipatory bail in Crime No.233 of 2013 of Balanagar PoliceStation, Mahabubnagar District, registered for the offencepunishable under Section 498-A of IPC.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioners – A2 to A5 and the learned Additional PublicProsecutor representing the respondent-State.
3. The de facto complainant, who was working as MPH, ANM developed physical contact with the first accused andbecame pregnant. According to her, the first accused promisedher to marry but subsequently refused to marry her. Theallegation against the petitioners – A2 to A5 is that they areforcing the first accused not to marry the de facto complainantby saying that she became pregnant by some other person. I donot see any active involvement of the petitioners – A2 to A5 inthe commission of offence alleged. Therefore, I am inclined togrant anticipatory bail to petitioners – A2 to A5.
4. In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed and thepetitioners-A2 to A5 are therefore directed to surrender beforethe Station House Officer, Balanagar Police Station,Mahabubnagar District, within twenty days from today andthereafter, they shall be released on bail on their executingpersonal bonds for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousandonly) each with two sureties for the like sum each to thesatisfaction of the said SHO.”
To
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
1. The I Additional Sessions Judge, Mahabubnagar District
2. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Jadcherla,Mahabubnagar DistrictMahabubnagar District
3. The Station House Officer, Balanagar Police Station,Mahabubnagar DistrictMahabubnagar District
4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad (OUT)Hyderabad (OUT)
5. One Spare Copy
6. One Cc to Sri M.Achutha Reddy, Advocate (OPUC)
HIGH COURT
ABDRAFTED ON 2-1-2014
RKRJ
DATE: 31-12-2013
ORDER
CRL.P. NO. 15275 OF 2013