Telangana High Court

WP/40221/2012 of Sri Swamy Vivekananda Educational Welfare Society, Vs The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, on 31 December 2012

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.40221 of 2012 ORDER: The writ petitioner is an educational institution situated at Visakapatnam City. It apprehends that the respondent-Greater Visakapatnam Municipal Corporation will demolish the existing structures and also take possession

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAOWRIT PETITION No.40221 of 2012

ORDER:

The writ petitioner is an educational institution situated atVisakapatnam City. It apprehends that the respondent-GreaterVisakapatnam Municipal Corporation will demolish the existing structuresand also take possession of the land belonging to the writ petitioner to asubstantial extent of 1464.23 sq. yards situated in Sy.Nos.28 and 31, PlotNos.11, 12 and 13, Sriharipuram, Gullalapalem village, GreaterVisakhapatnam Municipal Corporation limits, without adhering to theprinciples of the law on this subject. The apprehension is aided becauseof the markings that have been noted on the premises of the writpetitioner’s educational institution.

Sri N.Ranga Reddy, learned Standing counsel, who took notice onbehalf of the respondent, would assure this Court that if the petitioner isnot interested in giving its consent for acquisition of property, bynegotiations, the respondent Corporation will take recourse to law andacquire the property in accordance with law and then alone, eitherdemolish or take possession, even though there is urgency for the purposeof widening the existing 30 feet road.

In view of the assurance and also in view of the settled legalprinciple of law that if a citizen does not give consent for acquisition of anybuilding or land belonging to him, he cannot be deprived of his right tohold property, otherwise in accordance with law, this writ petition isdisposed of directing the respondent to take recourse to law and thenalone dispossess or demolish the structures standing on the site inquestion belonging to the petitioner. No costs.

Date:31-12-2012

Note:

Issue C.C. in two days

(B/o)

Prv

______________________________

NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO

WRIT PETITION No.40221 of 2012

Dated 31-12-2012

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead