Telangana High Court

WP/22979/2020 of M/s. Superman Personal Care Pvt ltd Vs Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT)/ Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST) and 2 others on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA" AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT wRlT PETITION NO: 22979 OF 2020 Between: AND lt/l/s. Superman Personal Care Pvt Ltd., No. 2, Jeedimetla Road, Phase 'l , IDA Jeedimetla,

[ [32s51]

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA"AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYANANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

wRlT PETITION NO: 22979 OF 2020

Between:

lt/l/s. Superman Personal Care Pvt Ltd., No. 2, Jeedimetla Road, Phase ['l ], IDAJeedimetla, Chinthal, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad, Telangana 500055Represented by its Authorized Signatory Madhavi Mudda, D/o. T RammohanRao, Aged about 50 years, R/o Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER

AND

'1 . Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT)/ Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST),Hyderabad Rural Division.. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT)/ Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST),Hyderabad Rural Division.

2. Commercial Tax Officer, IDA Gandhinagar Circle, Hyderabad.3. State of Telangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.3. State of Telangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, RevenueDepartment, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

..RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may becircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ. direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writ ofmandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No.20833 dated 31-03-2018passed by the Respondent No. 2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No.1214 dated 29-06-2020 passed by the Respondent No. 1 as being void, illegal,violative of Article 265and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution of lndia,totally without [jurisdiction ]and violative of the [principles ]of natural [justice.]passed by the Respondent No. 2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No.1214 dated 29-06-2020 passed by the Respondent No. 1 as being void, illegal,violative of Article 265and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution of lndia,totally without [jurisdiction ]and violative of the [principles ]of natural [justice.]

lA NO: 't OF 2O2O

Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that in the circumstances [stated ][an]the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the High Court may [be pleased to stay]

all further proceedings and consequential actions pursuant to the assessmentorder A.O.No.20B33 dated 31-03-2018 passed by the Respondent No. 2 andconsequently the impugned ADC Order No. 12'14 dated 29-06-2020 passed by theRespondent No- 1.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.NAGA DEEPAKCounsel for the Respondents: SRI K.RAJI REDDYThe Court made the following: ORDER

I

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHIIYANANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY

WRIT PETITION No.22979 of 2O2O

ORDER: (Per the Hoft'ble the Chief Justice Lljjal Bhugan)

Heard Mr. M.NagaDeepak, learned counsel for thepetitioner and Mr. K.RajiReddy, learned counsel for therespondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuantto One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme introduced by theGovernment of Telangana, petitioner has settled the tax disputewit"lr the State. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw thewrit petition.

3. In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed onwithdrawal Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall standclosed. However, there shail be no order as to costs.

SD/. T, JAYASREEASSISTANT REGISTRARsecrlb'Jhbrrrcen //TRUE COPY//

To,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. One CC to SRI M.NAGA DEEPAK, Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to SRI K.RAJt REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl3. Two CD Copies PSK.KKSBse.

I

I

HIGH COURT

DATED:3011212022

ORDERWP.No.22979 of 2020

DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONON WITHDRAWAL WITHOUT COSTS.

572^'",rV 6?-

'{ $E ST4I{-q..:d rE rEBzCInt,*.:*._l|!i?'' t.- .-," tl'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead