Telangana High Court
WP/24380/2020 of B.Ravindra Naik Vs The District Tribal Development Officer /Nodal Officer on 31 December 2020
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA(Special orisinat lurGJictiJn]'''!, v^,r?1 THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEI\i BERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTi PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No. 243800F2020 Between: AND 1 P;5l"i|*q Naik, S/o. Mansingh, ag.eQ About 41 years, Hostel
HIGH COU-RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA(Special orisinat lurGJictiJn]'''!, [v^,r?1]
THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEI\i BER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTi
PRESENT
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION No. 243800F2020
Between:
uraoe-,' P;5l"i|*q Government [Naik, S/o. Mansingh, ]sr Bovs-Hostdt nreocnir, [ag.eQ ][About ]41 r,rdic"ir;i-Ni;rk;jg;;6i;inr.i"'"'[years, ]Hostel Wetfare Officer
...PETITIONERAND
1The District rribar Deverooment officer /Nodar officer, Rangareddy District atHyderabadHyderabad2The District Collector (TW), Rangareddy District, Hyderabad.3The Commissioner of Tribal Welfare, State of Telangana, Hyderabad3The Commissioner of Tribal Welfare, State of Telangana, Hyderabad 4:119:l [T"lrlgana., ][rep.resented by ][its principat ][Secrerary, Tribat Wetfare]uepanment, Secretariat, Hyderabad.:119:l [T"lrlgana., ][rep.resented by ][its principat ][Secrerary, Tribat Wetfare]uepanment, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
5K._Narender, Hostel Welfare Officer Gr.ll, C/o. District Tribal DevelopmentOfficer, Rangareddy District at Hyderabad,Officer, Rangareddy District at Hyderabad,
6V.Sreelatha, Hostel Welfare Officer Grade-ll, C/o. District Tribal DevelopmentOfficer, Rangareddy District at Hyderabad.Officer, Rangareddy District at Hyderabad.
..,RESPONDENTS
Page 1 of 5
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleasedto issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the impugned final seniority list of Hostel Welfare OfficersGrade-ll of erstwhile Rangareddy District vide Memo. Rc.No. A110612020, dated2111112020 as being illegal, arbitrary, void and abinitio, contrary to rules andviolative of Articles ['14, ]16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia besides being opposedto all principles of natural [justice ]and consequently setaside the same and hold thatthe placement [given ]to the [petitioner ]at Sl.No. 1 in the tentative seniority list ofHostel Welfare Officers of erstwhile Rangareddy District vide It4emo. Rc.No.A110612020, dated: 41912020 issued by the ['1 ]st respondent is [perfectly ]legal, validand in order and consequently the [petitioner ]is entitled for [promotion ]to the [post of]Hostel Welfare Officer Grade-l in [preference ]to the unofficial respondents [5 ][and ][6]with all consequential benefits.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC [praying ]that [in ]the [circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit filed in support of the [petition, ]the [High Court may ][be ][pleased ][to ][direct]the respondents to consider the case of the [petitioner ][for ][promotion ][to the ][post ][of]Hostel Welfare Officer [grade-l ]in the existing [or ][future ][vacancies ][in ][preference ][to]the unofficial respondents 5 and 6 by suspending [the ][operation ][of the ][impugned]final seniority list of Hostel Welfare Officers [Grade-ll ][vide ][l\rlemo. ][Rc.No.]Al10612O2O, daled. 2111112020 in so far as [placements given ][to the ][petitioner ][and]the unofficial respondents are concerned.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. BALA KISHAN [RAO]
Counsel for the Respondents: GP [FOR ][SERVICES'll]
The Gourt made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE [ABHINAND ][KUMAR ][SHAVILI]
\r7.P.No.24380 OF [2020]
ORDER
Page 2 of 5
This writ petition [is ][filed ][seeking the ][following ][relief:]
"...to [issue ][a ][wtit, ][order ][or direction ][more particularly]onc in lhe nature of [Writ ][of ][Mandamus declaring ][the]impngned final seniority [list ][of Hostel ][Welfare Officets]Grade-II of ersnvhile [Rangareddy ][District ][I'ide ][Memo]Rc. No.A/106/2020 dated 2l/77/2020 [as ][being ][illegal,]arbitrary, void and abinitio, contrary to [tttles ][and]violative of Articles 14, 16 and [21 ]of thc Constitutiou [of]India besides bcing opposed to all principlcs of naturaljustice rnd conscquentlv sct aside the same and holdthat the placement given to the petitioner at Sl.No.l inthe tentative seniority list of Hostel Welfare Officers oferstrvhilc Rangareddy Disrict wde Memo Rc.No.respondent is perfectly legal, valid and in order andconsequently the petitioner is entitled for promotion tothe post of Hostel Welfate Officer Grade-I inpteference to the unofficial respondents 5 and 6 with allconsequential benefits and pass such other ordet ororders as this Hon'ble Couft may deem fit and proper.', Heard Sri D.Balakishan Rao, learned counsel appearingfor the petitioner, and learned Government pleacler forServices-II appearing for the ofhcial respondenrs.It is the case of the petitioner rhat he is rvorking asHostel Welfare Officer. The respondenrs have preparedLIprovisional senioriry list and the name of the petitioner liguredat serial No.l. Since his name lvas figured ar serial No.L, thepetitioner has not liled his objections to the said provisional seniority list. Thereafter, the respondents have issued theimpugned hnal senioriry list dated Zl.ll.202}, wherein thename of the petitioner was figured at serial No.3 on theground that he has not passed the departmental examinationswithin the stipulated period.
Page 3 of 5
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contendedthat the Public Service Commission has nor conducteddepartmental examinations. Even otherwise also, thepetitioner has passed the departmental examinations .lvithir-rthe stipulated pe riod and the respondents ought not to hzrvcaltered the position of the petitioner in the final senioriry list,Aggrieved by the impugned seniority list, the pctitioner haspreferred an appeal before the appellate authoriry on03.t2.2020, but the same is not yet disposed of. On the otherhand, the respondents are effecting promotions to the nextcadre of Hostel Welfare Officer Grade-I. Learned counselfurther contended that appropriate orders be passed in thewrit petition directing the appellate authority to dispose of theappeal preferred by the petitioner within a reasonable period.
Learned Government Pleader appearing for the officialrespondents conrended that since the appeal is pendingbefore the appellate authoritv, the appellate authoritv would consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordancewith larv.with larv.
Having considered the rival submissions made by thelearned counsel on either side, this Writ petition can bedisposed of directing the appellate aurhoriry to dispose of theappeal preferred by the petitioner on 03.12.2020 and passappropriate orders thereon, r.vithin a periocl of four weeks fromthe date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is needless to saythat if the appeal preferred by the petitioner is allowed by theappellate authority, then the respondents shall review thepromotion in terms of the order passed by the appellateauthority.
Accordingly, the $7rit petition is disposed of. No costs.Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD/.CH.VENKATESWARULUASSISTANT REGISTRAR,\\,/SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
I?S"'r:tJ::t Tribal Development officer /Nodal officer, Rangareddy District at
Page 4 of 5
Conclusion
2. The District Collector (TW), Rangareddy District, Hyderabad.The District Collector (TW), Rangareddy District, Hyderabad.3. t The Commissioner of Tribal Welfare, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.rribar t The Commissioner of Tribal Welfare, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.rribar l::':[?iJiil;.%T;l:?. werrare Department, State or rerangana,
5. One CC to Sri. D. Bala Kishan Rao, Advocate tOpUCltOpUCl
6. Two CCs to Gp for Services_ll, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT][OUT]7. Two C.D. Copies Prk HIGH GOURT
DATED:31 [11212020]
ORDERWP. No. 24380 of 2020
Disposing of the WP.without costs.
1HEsT4 14.Uot07 JAil2021*tt:.qr!tIr.
Page 5 of 5
Loading citations and judicial treatment…