Telangana High Court
WP/8055/2007 of V.B.S.S. Rama Krishnam Raju Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal on 24 December 2007
SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU W.P.Nos.8051, 8052, 8053, 8054 and 8055 of 2007 and C.C.Nos.1134, 1135, 1136, 1137 and 1138 of 2007 DATED: 27.12.2007 W.P.No.8051 of 2007: Between: R. Venkata Raju .. Petitioner And The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU
W.P.Nos.8051, 8052, 8053, 8054 and 8055 of 2007andC.C.Nos.1134, 1135, 1136, 1137 and 1138 of 2007
DATED: 27.12.2007
W.P.No.8051 of 2007:
Between:
R. Venkata Raju
.. Petitioner
And
The Government of AndhraPradesh rep. by its PrincipalSecretary, Higher EducationDepartment, Secretariat,Hyderabad and others.
.. Respondents
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU
W.P.Nos.8051, 8052, 8053, 8054 and 8055 of 2007andC.C.Nos.1134, 1135, 1136, 1137 and 1138 of 2007
W.P.Nos.8051, 8052, 8053, 8054 and 8055 of 2007:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
Questioning the order, dated 12.04.2007, passed by themanagement, terminating the services of the petitioners, the writpetitions have been filed.
While admitting the writ petitions on 27.07.2007, this Courtpassed interim orders suspending the order, dated 12.04.2007,impugned in the writ petitions and directing the management to permitthe petitioners to join duty forthwith in their respective posts.
The writ appeals filed by the management, against the saidinterim order dated 27.07.2007, were dismissed by a Division Bench ofthis Court, on 09.08.2007, advising the management to withdraw theorder, dated 12.04.2007, and take appropriate action in accordancewith law.
Now, the learned counsel for the respondents, while stating that the petitioners have been reinstated into service, placed before theCourt the proceedings, dated 20.09.2007, issued by the managementwithdrawing the order, dated 12.04.2007, impugned in the writpetitions.
In view of the above, nothing survives in the writ petitions forfurther adjudication.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.Noorder as to costs.
C.C.Nos.1134, 1135, 1136, 1137 and 1138 of 2007:
In view of the orders passed in the above writ petitions, thesecontempt cases are liable to be closed and are, accordingly, closed.
27[th] December, 2007.IBL
_________________JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU