Telangana High Court

WP/46260/2016 of Konapala Ramana Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principle on 29 December 2016

Cites 0, Cited by 0

RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.46260 of 2016 ORDER: 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the proceedings against him in FIR No.24 of 2011 on the file of Tekkali Police Station, Srikakulam District. 2. Heard and perused

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the proceedings against him in FIR No.24 of 2011 on the file of Tekkali Police Station, Srikakulam District.

2. Heard and perused the material available on record.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that the de facto complainant filed a false complaint against him before the 2[nd] respondent and the same was registered as the aforementioned case for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 120-B, 406, 407, 468 and 471 r/w 34 IPC and that the complaint does not contain any incriminating material and that the petitioner never did any criminal activities and that respondent No.2 is trying to arrest him without following due process of law.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submitted that on the basis of the said complaint, a case was registered against the petitioner and that the 2[nd] respondent is investigating into the matter in accordance with law.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the grievance of the petitioner and in view of the fact that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation, without expressing any opinion on merits, respondent No.2 is hereby directed to complete the investigation in the aforementioned crime and file a final report, in accordance with law in either way, without arresting the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to appear before respondent No.2 and execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) with one surety for the like sum to the satisfaction of the 2[nd] respondent, as surety for his future appearance as and when required for the purpose of investigation.

6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

________________

RAJA ELANGO, J

Date: 29[th] December, 2016 Nn

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

WRIT PETITION No.46260 of 2016

Date: 29[th] December, 2016

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead