Telangana High Court
WP/18786/2022 of A. Jyothi Vs Union of India and another on 31 December 2024
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION No: 18786 0F 2022 Between: A . Jvothi, W/o: Late S.V. Subba Rao. D/o Late A'S.
HIGH COURT [FOR ][THE STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE [THIRTY ][FIRST DAY ][OF DECEMBER]TWO THOUSAND [AND ][TWENTY ][FOUR]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SRI ][JUSTICE ][PULLA ][KARTHIK]
WRIT PETITION [N]o:[18786 ][0F ][2022]
Between:
A. Jvothi, W/o: [Late S.V. Subba Rao. D/o Late ][A'S. ][Ranganayakulu, ][Aged];b.,ii;;'r;;;;, oi.. nort" [*ife. ][Rvo ][H ][No ][l-e-202l26 ][Hanuman ][colonv']Kushaiguda, [HYDERABAD - 500062]
,,.PETITIONER
AND
1Union of lndia, [rep. ][by ][General ][l\,4anager ][South ][Central ][Railway ][Sanchalan]Bhavan SECUNDERABAD \Bhavan SECUNDERABAD \
2. Senior Divisional [Commissioner ][/ RPF, ][South ][Cen.tral ][Railway, Security]- eiinlf,, Hvaerabad Division / SC SECUNDERABAD- eiinlf,, Hvaerabad Division / SC SECUNDERABAD
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under [Article ][226 ][ol ][lhe constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that ][in ][the]circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtoissueorderororders,writorwrits,moreparticularlyinthenatureofwritof mandamus and [quash ][and set ][aside ][the ][2"d ][respondent ][order ][No. No. ][Y/_-]xP.l626t Pension l [HYBI ][2021 ][Dated 08.02.2022 being illegal, arbitrary, ][and-]contrary to the rules [and ][consequently direct ][the ][respondents to ][grant and ][release]theSecondaryfam|lypensiontothePetitionerConsideringtheincomecertificateand etc without [insisting ][for ][No ][objection certificate from ][her biological ][brothers ][in]
the i
IANO:1 OF 2022
PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedinthe affidavit filed [in support of the ][petition' the ][High ][Court ][may ][be ][pieased to direct]
I
ttii
the respondents to [pay ][the ][provisional ][family ][Pension to ][the ][petitioner pending writ]petition in the interest of [justice.]
Counsel for the Petitioner: [MS' SHAMAITHA, REPRESENTING ][FOR]SRI M. VENKANNA
Counsel forthe [Respondent ][No.1: ][SRI ][GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR,]DEPUW SOLICITOR [GENERAL OF INDIA]
Counsel for the Respondent [No.2: SRI NARAPARAJU AVANEESH]The Court made the following: [ORDER]
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No.18786 OF 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Ms.Shamaitha, learned counsel representing Sri M.Venkanna, learned counsel for the petitioner seekspermission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. Permission, as sought for, is accorded.3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs, Miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this writpetition sha1l stand closed AssrsrAi?r#'S'SmH
//TRUE [COPYI/]
ECTION[OFFICER]
To,1 3ffi [3313 ][3,,J*.Y"il:i::i''{*Yiil:J?'!"?l''''"' ]i 8IJ3J; [sri ][Naraparaiu Avaneesh' ][sctoPuocl]i. r*o [CD ][coPtes]TJGJP(+
Generar [or ][rndia]
HIGH COUR
DATED:31 11212024
ORDER
WP.No.18786 of 2022
1\-\6-[srAr]t';t)ia0 5 [uA'll,2[25](\'J\' :'\ ','I)rDEsPATo DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN
WITHOUT COSTS
?Pt3I'