Telangana High Court
WP/28645/2009 of M.MANOHAR REDDY AND 5 OTHERS Vs The Andhra Pradesh on 31 December 2009
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.28645 OF 2009 Between: M. Manohar Reddy, S/o. M. Chandra Reddy and others .....
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND NINE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.28645 OF 2009
Between:
M. Manohar Reddy, S/o. M. Chandra Reddy and others
..... PETITIONERS
AND
The Andhra Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Limited,Represented by its General Manager,Troop Bazar, Hyderabad and others
....RESPONDENTS
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.S. NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.28645 OF 2009
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The matter is coming up for admission.
2. This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring action of respondents in not considering the representation of the petitionersdated 23.12.2009, for grant of time till 31.03.2010 for payment of loanamount mentioned in the notices dated 14.12.2009 as illegal, arbitraryand consequently to direct the respondents to grant time till 31.03.2010for payment of loan amount mentioned in the notices dated 14.12.2009and pass such other suitable orders.
3. Several facts had been narrated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe writ petition.
4. In view of the facts and circumstances, this Court is of theconsidered opinion that the writ petition be disposed of directingrespondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitionersdated 23.12.2009 in accordance with law, within a period of four weeksfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be noorder as to costs.
___________________
P.S. NARAYANA, J
December 31, 2009MD