Telangana High Court
CRLP/12911/2023 of Patimedi Janardhan Reddy Vs The State of Telangana on 29 December 2023
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY , THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12911 OF 2023 Between: AND Patimedi Janardhan Reddy, S/o Chenna Reddy, aged about 55 years, Occ.
l,
[321e ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR [THE STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA]AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF [DECEIVIBER]TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY [THREE]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12911 OF 2023
Between:
Patimedi Janardhan Reddy, S/o Chenna Reddy, [aged about ][55 ][years, ][Occ.]Business, Fyo H.no.12-8-3881811113, [Mettugadda, Secunderabad'].PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public [Prosecutor, ][Through- ][Patancheru ][Police]Station, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, [For ][the ][State of ][Telangana. ]-Station, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, [For ][the ][State of ][Telangana. ]-2Kolkuri Veikatesham, Sio Chandraiah, aged [about 46 years, Occ. Business, ][Rl/o]H No S-30' Patacheru' Sanga Reddy District ...RESpoNDENTS/coMpLATNANTSH No S-30' Patacheru' Sanga Reddy District ...RESpoNDENTS/coMpLATNANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C [praying ][that ][in the ][circumstances]stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of [Criminal ][Petition, ][the ][High ][Court ][may ][be]pleased to quash the Proceedings in FlR.No.913 of 2023, dated [16.12.2023 ][on ][the]file of the Patancheru Police Station and [to ][grant]
l.A. NO: 1OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C [praying ][that ][in the ][circumstances]stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal [Petition,the High Court may ][be]pleased to dispense with the filing of Xerox copy of FlR.No.9'l3 [of ][2023, ][dated]16.12.2023 on the file of the Patancheru Police [Station.]
l.A. NO: 2OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C [praying ][that ][in the ][circumstances]stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal [Petition,the High Court may ][be]pleased to stay of all further Proceedings in FlR.No.913 of 2023, dated [16.12-2023]on the file of the Patancheru Police [Station ][pending disposdl ][of ][the ][Criminal]Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon [perusing ][the ][Memorandum of]Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing [the ][arguments ][of ][Ms. ][V. ][Deena,]learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri RAPOLU [BHASKAR, Advocate ][for ][the]Petitioner and the of sri B. suresh Goud Learned [Asst. ][Public ][Prosecutor ][on]behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of [Respondent ][No.2 ][is not ][appears ][in ][personal]or by Advocate.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVT DEVICRIMINAL PETITION No.1291L of2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is frled under Section 4g2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short [,Cr.p.C.J ]by thepetitioner, who is arrayed as accused, to quash the proceedingsagainst him in F.l.R.No.913 of 2023 on the file of the patalcheruPolice Station, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections417, 42O and 506 of I.P.C.
2. Heard Ms. V. Deena, Iearned Ms. V. Deena, Iearned V. Deena, Iearned Deena, Iearned counsel appearing on behalfon behalfbehalfof Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner/accused [and ]Sri B. Suresh Goud, learned Assistant [public]Prosecutor for respondent No.1 - State.
Heard Ms. V. Deena, Iearned Ms. V. Deena, Iearned V. Deena, Iearned Deena, Iearned counsel appearing on behalfon behalfbehalf
3. Without going into the merits of the case, since thepunishment prescribed for the offences alleged against thepetitioner/accused is less than seven (07) years, this Courtdeems it appropriate to direct the petitioner/accused to appearbefore the Investigating Officer on or before 12.OL.2O24 betweenO2:00 p.m. and 04:OO p.m. and in turn the Investigating Officer I
TMD,J
Crl.P.No.12911 OF 20;
is directed to follow the procedure taid down under Section [41-A]
of Cr.P.C. and also the guidelines formulated by the HonbleSupreme Court of India in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Biharrscrupulously. However, the petitioner/accused shall co-operatewith the Irwestigating Oflicer as and when required by furnishinginformation and documents as sought by them in [concluding the]investigation. The petitioner/ accused shall file [a-ll ][the documents]which he ought to file to prove that it does not come under [the]criminal offences and the Investigating Offrcer shall [consider the]sarne before frling appropriate report before the [learned]Magistrate concerned.
4. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed [of.]
Miscellaleous applications, if any pending, shall [also]stand closed.
Sd/. MOHD, ISMAILASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, [(Excise ]& [Prohibitions) at Sangareddy.]
2. The Station House Officer, Patancheru [Police ]Station, [Sangareddy.]
3. One CC to Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, [Advocate ]IOPUCI
4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana [(OUT)]
5. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT
DATED:291'12J2O23
ORDERCRLP.No.12911 ot 2O23
CRIMTNAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF
x("
'1[\\][6 ][SIATG]q,o1 [1 ][l[.\ ][2l\2[]oo+lOESPI1.'. tl-